{"id":163811,"date":"2025-09-24T21:37:22","date_gmt":"2025-09-25T05:37:22","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/?p=163811"},"modified":"2025-09-25T05:34:20","modified_gmt":"2025-09-25T13:34:20","slug":"the-legacy-of-ernest-becker-death-ideologies-and-cultures","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/?p=163811","title":{"rendered":"The Legacy of Ernest Becker: Death, Ideologies, and Cultures"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>I asked ChatGPT to decode this Youtube video for talking points for my big Sunday show:<\/p>\n<p><iframe width=\"560\" height=\"315\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/7T8WqjciN1E?si=WoohPqXGRbpjIY-e\" title=\"YouTube video player\" frameborder=\"0\" allow=\"accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share\" referrerpolicy=\"strict-origin-when-cross-origin\" allowfullscreen><\/iframe><\/p>\n<p>Use Terror Management Theory (TMT) as the case study. Walk through the classic mortality-salience experiments, then the replication crisis: <a href=\"https:\/\/www.google.com\/search?q=Many+Labs+4+terror+management+theory\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Many Labs 4<\/a> couldn\u2019t replicate the key worldview-defense effect; several high-powered failures followed; defenders say nulls are over-interpreted. What counts as confirmation vs. motivated reasoning? Useful jumping-off points: <a href=\"https:\/\/www.google.com\/search?q=terror+management+theory+replication\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">TMT replication overview<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.google.com\/search?q=worldview+defense+mortality+salience+meta+analysis\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">meta-analyses<\/a>.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<h2>Do death reminders push people left\u2014or just harder into whatever they already believe?<\/h2>\n<p>TMT\u2019s core claim is <em>worldview defense<\/em>: reminders of death intensify pre-existing values (not one side\u2019s \u201chero system\u201d). Early and newer syntheses frame it that way despite replication hits. Links: <a href=\"https:\/\/www.google.com\/search?q=worldview+defense+terror+management+theory+meta+analysis\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">worldview-defense meta<\/a>, and critiques: <a href=\"https:\/\/www.google.com\/search?q=terror+management+theory+critique+publication+bias\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">publication bias\/critique<\/a>.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<h2>Death anxiety and the ballot box\u20142004 to 2024\/25<\/h2>\n<p>Revisit studies showing mortality salience boosted support for George W. Bush post-9\/11 and for charismatic\/authoritarian leadership styles; then fast-forward to work tying death reminders to support for Donald Trump. Discussion hooks: <a href=\"https:\/\/www.google.com\/search?q=mortality+salience+support+for+Bush+2004+study\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Bush 2004 studies<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.google.com\/search?q=mortality+salience+charismatic+leadership+weber\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">charismatic leadership &amp; death reminders<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.google.com\/search?q=mortality+salience+trump+study\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Trump-era experiments<\/a>.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<h2>Follow the lab coats: researcher clusters and publication bias<\/h2>\n<p>Evidence suggests \u201cresearcher\/lab effects\u201d and selective reporting inflated early TMT effects. Use this to question any claim that the literature uniquely props up one political frame. See: <a href=\"https:\/\/www.google.com\/search?q=terror+management+theory+publication+bias+z-curve\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">z-curve\/selection bias analyses<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.google.com\/search?q=lab+clustering+effects+psychology+replication\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">lab-cluster effects<\/a>.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<h2>Money as medicine for death anxiety? Consumerism and status goods<\/h2>\n<p>Findings that counting cash reduces death anxiety and that mortality salience boosts desire for status goods are catchy\u2014but how robust are they post-2015? Tie to today\u2019s luxury boom and inflation. Starters: <a href=\"https:\/\/www.google.com\/search?q=counting+money+reduces+pain+or+death+anxiety+study\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">\u201ccounting money\u201d buffer effect<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.google.com\/search?q=mortality+salience+conspicuous+consumption\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">mortality salience &amp; consumption<\/a>.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<h2>Climate dread vs. Becker: greener\u2014or more extractive?<\/h2>\n<p>Some TMT work links death reminders to resource extraction and out-group hardening; other work shows threat can increase pro-environment attitudes inside certain ideologies. Use this tension to talk climate messaging. Search hubs: <a href=\"https:\/\/www.google.com\/search?q=mortality+salience+environmental+attitudes+study\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">death reminders &amp; environmental attitudes<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.google.com\/search?q=mortality+salience+resource+extraction+experiment\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">resource extraction experiments<\/a>.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<h2>Charisma, \u201cevil,\u201d and the news cycle<\/h2>\n<p>Becker predicted hunger for larger-than-life leaders in times of threat. Use current strongman politics as a test case\u2014does the lens explain more than it predicts? Backgrounders: <a href=\"https:\/\/www.google.com\/search?q=Becker+escape+from+evil+charismatic+leaders\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>Escape from Evil<\/em> on charisma<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.google.com\/search?q=existential+threat+support+authoritarian+leaders+study\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">threat &amp; authoritarian support<\/a>.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<h2>Are we just \u201cbreathing meat\u201d? The philosophy pitch vs. the data pitch<\/h2>\n<p>Contrast Becker\u2019s existential claims with empirical rivals (e.g., the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.google.com\/search?q=Meaning+Maintenance+Model\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Meaning Maintenance Model<\/a>). What remains uniquely TMT once you strip the poetry? Where do data clearly discriminate?<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<h2>Terror headlines, prejudice, and WEIRD samples<\/h2>\n<p>Walk through studies where terrorism news or mortality salience spikes prejudice\/distancing, then ask if effects are large, reliable, and generalizable beyond WEIRD samples. Pointers: <a href=\"https:\/\/www.google.com\/search?q=mortality+salience+prejudice+terrorism+news\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">terror news &amp; prejudice<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.google.com\/search?q=WEIRD+samples+psychology+generalizability\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">WEIRD-sample critiques<\/a>.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<h2>Mental-health epidemics and \u201cunwinnable\u201d hero systems<\/h2>\n<p>Becker argues cultures set unattainable status targets that breed despair; link to today\u2019s youth mental-health stats. But note: this is a theorist\u2019s narrative more than a nailed-down causal model. Resources: <a href=\"https:\/\/www.google.com\/search?q=youth+mental+health+trends+2024+2025+CDC\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">current youth mental-health data<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.google.com\/search?q=Becker+Denial+of+Death+summary\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>Denial of Death<\/em> summary<\/a>.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<h2>Indigenous ancestors vs. \u201cdenial of death\u201d<\/h2>\n<p>Open with the conference land-acknowledgment segment (living with ancestors vs. denying death). Place Becker alongside Indigenous and religious frameworks now resurfacing in public life; ask which worldviews buffer anxiety without fueling polarization. Background: <a href=\"https:\/\/www.google.com\/search?q=land+acknowledgment+Indigenous+ancestors+public+life\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">land-acknowledgment\/ancestor practices<\/a>.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<hr \/>\n<h2>On your pointed question: \u201cHow come all their studies support their left-wing hero system?\u201d<\/h2>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>They don\u2019t, cleanly.<\/strong> TMT\u2019s strongest claim is that death reminders intensify <em>pre-existing<\/em> worldviews. Famous political studies showed boosts for conservative\/charismatic leaders under mortality salience, which undercuts \u201cit proves the left.\u201d See: <a href=\"https:\/\/www.google.com\/search?q=mortality+salience+support+for+Bush+2004+study\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Bush 2004 work<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.google.com\/search?q=terror+management+theory+authoritarianism+study\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">authoritarian\/charisma studies<\/a>.<\/li>\n<li><strong>The literature\u2019s credibility is mixed.<\/strong> Multi-lab projects and high-powered studies failed to replicate cornerstone effects; meta critiques point to selective reporting and lab-cluster inflation. So if someone says \u201cthe science proves Becker\u2014and my politics,\u201d press them here. See: <a href=\"https:\/\/www.google.com\/search?q=Many+Labs+4+terror+management+theory\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Many Labs 4<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.google.com\/search?q=terror+management+theory+publication+bias\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">publication bias<\/a>.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Best defensible takeaway:<\/strong> threat can polarize people toward prior identities and toward leaders promising meaning\/security. Anything broader is overreach. Overview: <a href=\"https:\/\/www.google.com\/search?q=terror+management+theory+overview\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">TMT overviews<\/a>.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Here\u2019s a synthesis of how we can \u201cdecode\u201d Terror Management Theory (TMT) through the lenses of Rony Guldmann, Stephen Turner, and Darel E. Paul. Each gives us a way to situate TMT not just as a psychological research program, but as part of the cultural and political battles around expertise, legitimacy, and elite ideology.<\/p>\n<p>1. Rony Guldmann: TMT as Liberal Cultural Weaponry<\/p>\n<p>In <A HREF=\"https:\/\/ronyguldmann.com\/conservative-claims-cultural-oppression\/\">Conservative Claims of Cultural Oppression<\/a>, Guldmann describes how conservatives feel subject to a progressive \u201cClerisy\u201d\u2014knowledge elites who frame dissent as irrational pathology, reducing conservatism to fear, prejudice, or \u201catavism.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>TMT, read this way, can be seen as one more intellectual project that \u201cpsychologizes\u201d political opposition. By claiming that mortality salience drives prejudice, authoritarianism, and resistance to progressive causes, TMT fits into what Guldmann calls liberalism\u2019s \u201csymbolic domination.\u201d It recasts ideological contest as a matter of psychological immaturity. The worldview-defense paradigm can then be read as an attempt to \u201cscientifically\u201d demonstrate that conservatives are driven by unconscious death-anxiety rather than legitimate values. This is exactly the kind of move conservatives denounce as cultural oppression: pathologizing their commitments while presenting liberal commitments as \u201crational\u201d and mature.<\/p>\n<p>2. Stephen Turner: TMT and the Politics of Expertise<\/p>\n<p>Turner\u2019s <A HREF=\"https:\/\/www.amazon.com\/Politics-Expertise-Routledge-Studies-Political\/dp\/0415709431\">The Politics of Expertise<\/a> stresses how social science often establishes authority by embedding normative judgments within allegedly neutral expertise . Experts, under the guise of empirical science, become arbiters of what counts as rationality, maturity, or progress.<\/p>\n<p>TMT exemplifies this dynamic. Its claims about mortality salience aren\u2019t just scientific hypotheses; they function as judgments about which worldviews are \u201cdefensive\u201d and which are \u201cauthentic.\u201d Turner would argue that this reflects an expert power-play: the ability of psychologists to translate philosophical anthropology (Becker\u2019s denial of death) into laboratory authority. The replication crisis (Many Labs 4) then undermines not only TMT\u2019s specific claims, but the broader credibility of this expert project. For Turner, the key point is not whether TMT replicates, but how it embodies the modern tendency for experts to dictate cultural meaning under the mask of science.<\/p>\n<p>3. Darel E. Paul: <A HREF=\"https:\/\/www.amazon.com\/Tolerance-Equality-Brought-Same-Sex-Marriage-ebook\/dp\/B07TXLF568\/\">From Tolerance to Equality: How Elites Brought America to Same-Sex Marriage<\/a><\/p>\n<p>Paul\u2019s From Tolerance to Equality is about how elites constructed same-sex marriage acceptance as a class-defining norm. He uses Bourdieu to argue that what looks like moral progress is often an expression of professional-class cultural capital.<\/p>\n<p>Applied to TMT, Paul\u2019s framework highlights how the theory dovetails with elite values: multicultural tolerance, cosmopolitanism, and stigmatization of \u201cparochial\u201d traditionalism. The fact that early TMT studies often showed mortality salience increasing prejudice, nationalism, and religious conviction meant it could be mobilized as a justification for elite projects of normalization. The subtext: those clinging to traditional identities are \u201cdeath-denying,\u201d while elite cosmopolitanism is implicitly death-transcending. Paul\u2019s analysis suggests TMT gained traction not just because of its scientific merit but because it flattered and legitimated the worldview of the professional-managerial class.<\/p>\n<p>Putting It Together<\/p>\n<p>Guldmann \u2192 TMT as liberal pathologizing of dissent (conservatives as death-driven neurotics).<\/p>\n<p>Turner \u2192 TMT as expertise-politics (scientific authority smuggling in normative judgments about maturity, progress, rationality).<\/p>\n<p>Paul \u2192 TMT as elite-class ideology (scientific cover for cosmopolitan normalization projects).<\/p>\n<p>Seen through these three, TMT is less a neutral research program than a cultural artifact of late-20th-century elite liberalism\u2014one that converts existential philosophy (Becker) into social-psychological expertise, while reinforcing the symbolic dominance of progressive class values and delegitimizing rival worldviews.<\/p>\n<p>Let\u2019s decode the replication crisis around Terror Management Theory (TMT) with the three thinkers:<\/p>\n<p>1. Rony Guldmann: Replication Failures as Conservative Vindication<\/p>\n<p>Guldmann\u2019s theme in Conservative Claims of Cultural Oppression is that liberal elites construct a \u201cprogressive Clerisy\u201d that pathologizes conservatism as irrational, fearful, or regressive. TMT has been one of those tools: experiments \u201cshow\u201d that reminders of death make people racist, nationalist, authoritarian, etc.<\/p>\n<p>When the Many Labs 4 project and other high-powered replications failed to reproduce the core \u201cworldview-defense\u201d effect, conservatives could read this as validation. What looked like scientific proof that they are neurotic \u201cdeath-deniers\u201d now appears shaky. For Guldmann, replication failures expose the liberal cultural weaponry at work: science wasn\u2019t neutral, it was part of a symbolic regime aimed at delegitimizing conservative identities. In this frame, replication collapse is a crack in the Clerisy\u2019s armor.<\/p>\n<p>2. Stephen Turner: Expertise Exposed<\/p>\n<p>Turner\u2019s The Politics of Expertise stresses that expert authority rests not just on truth, but on social structures that allow certain groups to define reality. TMT translated Becker\u2019s existential philosophy into \u201cscientific fact,\u201d giving psychologists authority to speak on culture, politics, and morality.<\/p>\n<p>The replication crisis shows what Turner would call the fragility of expert legitimation. Once the experiments fail, the supposed scientific foundation for sweeping cultural claims erodes. But the authority move remains visible: psychologists positioned themselves as arbiters of human irrationality, deciding whose worldview is \u201cdefensive\u201d and whose is \u201cauthentic.\u201d Replication failures don\u2019t just undermine TMT\u2014they undermine trust in the broader expert system that lets psychologists pronounce on morality and politics under the cover of laboratory science.<\/p>\n<p>3. Darel E. Paul: Class Ideology Unmasked<\/p>\n<p>Paul\u2019s From Tolerance to Equality argues that professional-class elites dress their cultural preferences as universal progress. TMT fit neatly into that: its findings flattered cosmopolitan, liberal values while casting traditional attachments as anxiety-driven.<\/p>\n<p>Replication failures puncture that ideological project. If mortality salience doesn\u2019t reliably drive prejudice or \u201cdefensive conservatism,\u201d then the scientific evidence for elite cosmopolitan superiority is less secure. Paul would see this as the professional-managerial class losing one of its \u201cknowledge weapons\u201d in the struggle to normalize its values. The cracks in TMT\u2019s data highlight how social science often stabilizes elite norms rather than neutrally describing human nature.<\/p>\n<p>Synthesis<\/p>\n<p>Guldmann \u2192 Replication failures = exposure of liberal pathologizing as overreach.<\/p>\n<p>Turner \u2192 Failures = collapse of expert authority claims, revealing how fragile the authority of social psychology is.<\/p>\n<p>Paul \u2192 Failures = loss of ideological reinforcement for cosmopolitan\/progressive class values.<\/p>\n<p>So, if the rise of TMT in the 1990s\u20132000s was about science lending authority to Becker\u2019s death-denial philosophy in ways that reinforced elite liberal narratives, the replication crisis shows the limits of that authority: the science can no longer stabilize the cultural claims it once did.<\/p>\n<p>Script: \u201cThe Rise and Fall of Terror Management Theory\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Opening (Hook)<\/p>\n<p>\u201cBack in the 1990s, psychologists thought they had cracked the code of Ernest Becker\u2019s philosophy. His Pulitzer Prize\u2013winning book The Denial of Death argued that humans cling to cultural worldviews to manage our fear of mortality. A group of researchers claimed they could prove this in the lab. They called it Terror Management Theory, or TMT.<\/p>\n<p>And the studies were dramatic. Remind people of death, and suddenly they become more nationalistic, more religious, harsher toward outsiders. It seemed to explain everything \u2014 prejudice, politics, even George W. Bush\u2019s surge in popularity after 9\/11.<\/p>\n<p>But two decades later, something happened: those same experiments stopped working. Replication after replication failed. And the collapse of TMT tells us something much bigger than psychology \u2014 it tells us about class, culture, and the politics of expertise.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Part I: What TMT Claimed<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe heart of Terror Management Theory is simple: mortality salience, or reminding people of their death, makes them cling harder to their worldview.<\/p>\n<p>If you were Christian, you liked Christians more and disliked Jews. If you were Jewish, you liked Jews more and disliked Arabs. In the U.S., reminders of death made people more patriotic, more conservative, more punitive.<\/p>\n<p>This was hailed as Becker\u2019s philosophy becoming science. No longer just existential speculation \u2014 now we had experiments, graphs, p-values. Psychologists could claim they had found the engine of ideology.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Part II: The Replication Crisis Hits<\/p>\n<p>\u201cBut then came the replication crisis. In 2019, the massive Many Labs 4 project \u2014 dozens of labs, thousands of participants \u2014 tried to replicate the classic worldview defense effect. Result? Nothing. Null.<\/p>\n<p>Independent teams across continents found the same: the effect was fragile or simply vanished. What once seemed like a profound universal law of psychology began to look like an artifact of small samples and selective reporting.<\/p>\n<p>The empirical foundation crumbled. Yet the cultural significance of TMT remained. And that\u2019s where we turn to three critics: Rony Guldmann, Stephen Turner, and Darel Paul.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Part III: Guldmann \u2014 Liberal Science as Cultural Oppression<\/p>\n<p>\u201cRony Guldmann writes about how conservatives feel pathologized by what he calls the liberal \u2018clerisy\u2019 \u2014 a cultural ruling class of academics and professionals. In his words, conservative identity gets cast as a form of cultural oppression.<\/p>\n<p>And isn\u2019t that exactly what TMT did? It proved \u2014 quote-unquote proved \u2014 that conservative values like religion, nationalism, or traditional morality were really just irrational death defenses. Cosmopolitan liberalism, by contrast, was framed as authentic, mature, free of denial.<\/p>\n<p>When the replication failures came, conservatives could feel vindicated. They showed that what passed as neutral science was really ideology dressed up in lab coats.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Part IV: Turner \u2014 Expertise and its Fragility<\/p>\n<p>\u201cStephen Turner focuses on the politics of expertise. Experts don\u2019t just discover facts \u2014 they claim authority, they decide what counts as knowledge.<\/p>\n<p>TMT was a perfect example. By turning Becker\u2019s philosophy into experiments, psychologists gave themselves the authority to speak on politics, culture, even morality. They could say, \u2018We have data showing why you cling to God, or why you vote conservative.\u2019<\/p>\n<p>But when replication collapsed, the authority collapsed with it. Once the lab effects vanish, what\u2019s left? Naked normative judgments about who is enlightened and who is defensive. Turner helps us see that replication crises aren\u2019t just technical \u2014 they\u2019re political events that shake the authority of entire expert communities.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Part V: Paul \u2014 Elite Class Values and Normalization<br \/>\n\u201cDarel Paul studies how elites normalize their values \u2014 especially cosmopolitanism, tolerance, and equality \u2014 by presenting them as universal moral progress.<\/p>\n<p>TMT fit right in. It showed that open-mindedness was authentic, while traditionalism was immature. It mapped perfectly onto the professional-managerial class\u2019s worldview, giving it scientific legitimacy.<\/p>\n<p>But when the science falls apart, that sheen disappears. The claims no longer rest on data, only on ideology. And Paul reminds us that science often props up elite norms \u2014 and when it fails, those norms stand exposed as class politics, not universal truth.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Closing Synthesis<\/p>\n<p>\u201cSo put it all together:<\/p>\n<p>Guldmann shows us TMT as liberal pathologizing of conservatives.<\/p>\n<p>Turner shows us TMT as an expert power-play.<\/p>\n<p>Paul shows us TMT as a class ideology disguised as science.<\/p>\n<p>Together, they decode TMT\u2019s story. It wasn\u2019t just a theory of death \u2014 it was a cultural weapon. And its replication collapse is more than a methodological hiccup. It\u2019s a case study in how elites use science to naturalize their own worldviews, and what happens when that science can no longer deliver.<\/p>\n<p>Maybe the real lesson of Terror Management Theory is this: the politics of death denial tell us less about human nature, and more about how power, class, and expertise shape what we call knowledge.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Jimmy Kimmel got suspended for saying: \u201cWe hit some new lows over the weekend with the MAGA gang desperately trying to characterize this kid who murdered Charlie Kirk as anything other than one of them, and doing everything they can to score political points from it.\u201d <\/p>\n<p>Now listen to this social psychologist Sheldon Solomon lying about creationists wanting to kill anyone who speaks up for Darwinian evolution. <\/p>\n<p><iframe width=\"560\" height=\"315\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/1tkkmInXfOE?si=HTCVNSRne84GpmrS\" title=\"YouTube video player\" frameborder=\"0\" allow=\"accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share\" referrerpolicy=\"strict-origin-when-cross-origin\" allowfullscreen><\/iframe><\/p>\n<p>Sheldon Solomon: &#8220;Assumption number one is just the basic Darwinian assumption \u2014 that people share with all forms of life a basic biological predisposition toward staying alive, in the service not only of survival but also reproduction. Darwin called that the struggle for survival. Living things like to stay alive. How\u2019s that \u2014 is that okay? All right, this is Canada and you can get away with that. But in America, you can\u2019t even say that without just storms of angry people charging the stage, trying to tear your heart out and show it to you while it\u2019s still beating, before you die. But this is good today [because he&#8217;s speaking to secular leftists who are super tolerant]\u2026&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>This is a blood libel against creationists. No such mobs exist, of course. But the exaggeration does important rhetorical work. It casts Solomon as the brave truth-teller surrounded by enemies, and it frames dissent from Darwinian orthodoxy as not merely mistaken, but dangerous.<\/p>\n<p>Political comedian or psychology professor\u2014the strategy is the same. Exaggerate the threat, pathologize the opponent, and immunize yourself from critique.<\/p>\n<p>Rony Guldmann would call this a clerisy move: elites pathologizing conservatives as irrational and violent.<\/p>\n<p>Stephen Turner would note that it\u2019s an expertise play: using persecution stories to shore up scientific authority.<\/p>\n<p>Darel Paul would point out how elite values get smuggled in as \u201ccommon sense\u201d: accept Darwin and cosmopolitanism, or be cast outside the moral community.<\/p>\n<p>What looks like a joke or a monologue punchline is really politics by another name. When Kimmel calls conservatives a death cult, or when Solomon paints creationists as bloodthirsty mobs, both are engaged in the same ritual: inflating the threat of the Other in order to cement the righteousness of their own camp.<\/p>\n<p>It\u2019s worth asking: if your case is strong, why reach for bogeymen? The louder the caricature, the weaker the science or politics behind it often turns out to be.<\/p>\n<p>What if Sheldon had aimed his blood libel at Jews instead of creationists? How would that affect his standing?<\/p>\n<p>If Sheldon Solomon had said, in so many words, \u201cYou can\u2019t mention Darwin in America without Jews charging the stage to rip your heart out and show it to you while it\u2019s still beating\u201d \u2014 instead of saying that about creationists \u2014 his academic career and cultural standing would likely be over.<\/p>\n<p>Here\u2019s why:<\/p>\n<p>Normative Hierarchies of Speech.<\/p>\n<p>Darel Paul would note that our elite institutions enforce strong boundaries around which groups can and can\u2019t be stigmatized. Jews (along with certain other minorities) sit inside a highly protected moral circle. Creationists, by contrast, are coded as backward, white, rural, and therefore fair game.<\/p>\n<p>Pathologizing \u201cSafe Targets.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Rony Guldmann\u2019s idea of the liberal clerisy explains why Solomon feels free to caricature creationists. They are already culturally pathologized: portrayed as irrational, dangerous, and in need of elite correction. But swap in Jews and suddenly you\u2019re reproducing one of history\u2019s most notorious slanders \u2014 the blood libel \u2014 with its centuries of lethal consequences. That\u2019s an untouchable taboo.<\/p>\n<p>Fragility of Expertise.<\/p>\n<p>Stephen Turner would emphasize the fragility of expert authority. Solomon\u2019s joke \u201cworks\u201d in elite circles because it flatters their worldview. But if he leveled the same imagery at Jews, it would instantly expose the ideological nature of his rhetoric. His authority would collapse, and he\u2019d be cast out of the academic community.<\/p>\n<p>The Asymmetry Reveals the Politics.<\/p>\n<p>The fact that creationists can be safely caricatured as murderous mobs while Jews cannot underscores that Solomon\u2019s joke was never neutral science humor. It was a political move aimed at a permitted out-group. His standing is secure only because his target is culturally designated as safe to mock.<\/p>\n<p>Bottom line:<\/p>\n<p>If Solomon had aimed his \u201cblood libel\u201d imagery at Jews, he\u2019d be denounced, likely lose his platform, and be remembered not as Becker\u2019s heir but as a disgraced bigot. The asymmetry shows us that this isn\u2019t really about truth or science \u2014 it\u2019s about which groups our culture allows to be demonized, and which it fiercely protects.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I asked ChatGPT to decode this Youtube video for talking points for my big Sunday show: Use Terror Management Theory (TMT) as the case study. Walk through the classic mortality-salience experiments, then the replication crisis: Many Labs 4 couldn\u2019t replicate &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/?p=163811\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"om_disable_all_campaigns":false,"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[17382],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-163811","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-psychology"],"aioseo_notices":[],"aioseo_head":"\n\t\t<!-- All in One SEO 4.9.10 - aioseo.com -->\n\t<meta name=\"description\" content=\"I asked ChatGPT to decode this Youtube video for talking points for my big Sunday show: Use Terror Management Theory (TMT) as the case study. Walk through the classic mortality-salience experiments, then the replication crisis: Many Labs 4 couldn\u2019t replicate the key worldview-defense effect; several high-powered failures followed; defenders say nulls are over-interpreted. What counts\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"max-image-preview:large\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Luke Ford\"\/>\n\t<meta name=\"google-site-verification\" content=\"HMjuOfLRyzTPB-5Z5FG4BHkfZ1fbEij34rmbKM3BkZ4\" \/>\n\t<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/?p=163811\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"generator\" content=\"All in One SEO (AIOSEO) 4.9.10\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Luke Ford - No sacred cows.\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"The Legacy of Ernest Becker: Death, Ideologies, and Cultures - Luke Ford\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"I asked ChatGPT to decode this Youtube video for talking points for my big Sunday show: Use Terror Management Theory (TMT) as the case study. Walk through the classic mortality-salience experiments, then the replication crisis: Many Labs 4 couldn\u2019t replicate the key worldview-defense effect; several high-powered failures followed; defenders say nulls are over-interpreted. What counts\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/?p=163811\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/lukesanta.jpg\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"og:image:secure_url\" content=\"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/lukesanta.jpg\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"800\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"600\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-09-25T05:37:22+00:00\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-09-25T13:34:20+00:00\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/lukecford\" \/>\n\t\t<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n\t\t<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@lukeford\" \/>\n\t\t<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"The Legacy of Ernest Becker: Death, Ideologies, and Cultures - Luke Ford\" \/>\n\t\t<meta name=\"twitter:description\" content=\"I asked ChatGPT to decode this Youtube video for talking points for my big Sunday show: Use Terror Management Theory (TMT) as the case study. Walk through the classic mortality-salience experiments, then the replication crisis: Many Labs 4 couldn\u2019t replicate the key worldview-defense effect; several high-powered failures followed; defenders say nulls are over-interpreted. What counts\" \/>\n\t\t<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@lukeford\" \/>\n\t\t<meta name=\"twitter:image\" content=\"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/lukesanta.jpg\" \/>\n\t\t<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"aioseo-schema\">\n\t\t\t{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"BlogPosting\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lukeford.net\\\/blog\\\/?p=163811#blogposting\",\"name\":\"The Legacy of Ernest Becker: Death, Ideologies, and Cultures - Luke Ford\",\"headline\":\"The Legacy of Ernest Becker: Death, Ideologies, and Cultures\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lukeford.net\\\/blog\\\/?author=1#author\"},\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lukeford.net\\\/blog\\\/#person\"},\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lukeford.net\\\/blog\\\/?p=163811#articleImage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lukeford.net\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/litespeed\\\/avatar\\\/af8ecf5ef66099147247f500ec429b38.jpg?ver=1784204923\",\"width\":96,\"height\":96,\"caption\":\"Luke Ford\"},\"datePublished\":\"2025-09-24T21:37:22-08:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-09-25T05:34:20-08:00\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lukeford.net\\\/blog\\\/?p=163811#webpage\"},\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lukeford.net\\\/blog\\\/?p=163811#webpage\"},\"articleSection\":\"Psychology\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lukeford.net\\\/blog\\\/?p=163811#breadcrumblist\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lukeford.net\\\/blog#listItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lukeford.net\\\/blog\",\"nextItem\":{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lukeford.net\\\/blog\\\/?cat=17382#listItem\",\"name\":\"Psychology\"}},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lukeford.net\\\/blog\\\/?cat=17382#listItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Psychology\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lukeford.net\\\/blog\\\/?cat=17382\",\"nextItem\":{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lukeford.net\\\/blog\\\/?p=163811#listItem\",\"name\":\"The Legacy of Ernest Becker: Death, Ideologies, and Cultures\"},\"previousItem\":{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lukeford.net\\\/blog#listItem\",\"name\":\"Home\"}},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lukeford.net\\\/blog\\\/?p=163811#listItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"The Legacy of Ernest Becker: Death, Ideologies, and Cultures\",\"previousItem\":{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lukeford.net\\\/blog\\\/?cat=17382#listItem\",\"name\":\"Psychology\"}}]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lukeford.net\\\/blog\\\/#person\",\"name\":\"Luke Ford\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lukeford.net\\\/blog\\\/?p=163811#personImage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lukeford.net\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/litespeed\\\/avatar\\\/af8ecf5ef66099147247f500ec429b38.jpg?ver=1784204923\",\"width\":96,\"height\":96,\"caption\":\"Luke Ford\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lukeford.net\\\/blog\\\/?author=1#author\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lukeford.net\\\/blog\\\/?author=1\",\"name\":\"Luke Ford\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lukeford.net\\\/blog\\\/?p=163811#authorImage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lukeford.net\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/litespeed\\\/avatar\\\/af8ecf5ef66099147247f500ec429b38.jpg?ver=1784204923\",\"width\":96,\"height\":96,\"caption\":\"Luke Ford\"}},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lukeford.net\\\/blog\\\/?p=163811#webpage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lukeford.net\\\/blog\\\/?p=163811\",\"name\":\"The Legacy of Ernest Becker: Death, Ideologies, and Cultures - Luke Ford\",\"description\":\"I asked ChatGPT to decode this Youtube video for talking points for my big Sunday show: Use Terror Management Theory (TMT) as the case study. Walk through the classic mortality-salience experiments, then the replication crisis: Many Labs 4 couldn\\u2019t replicate the key worldview-defense effect; several high-powered failures followed; defenders say nulls are over-interpreted. What counts\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lukeford.net\\\/blog\\\/#website\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lukeford.net\\\/blog\\\/?p=163811#breadcrumblist\"},\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lukeford.net\\\/blog\\\/?author=1#author\"},\"creator\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lukeford.net\\\/blog\\\/?author=1#author\"},\"datePublished\":\"2025-09-24T21:37:22-08:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-09-25T05:34:20-08:00\"},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lukeford.net\\\/blog\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lukeford.net\\\/blog\\\/\",\"name\":\"Luke Ford\",\"alternateName\":\"No Sacred Cows\",\"description\":\"No sacred cows.\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lukeford.net\\\/blog\\\/#person\"}}]}\n\t\t<\/script>\n\t\t<!-- All in One SEO -->\n\n","aioseo_head_json":{"title":"The Legacy of Ernest Becker: Death, Ideologies, and Cultures - Luke Ford","description":"I asked ChatGPT to decode this Youtube video for talking points for my big Sunday show: Use Terror Management Theory (TMT) as the case study. Walk through the classic mortality-salience experiments, then the replication crisis: Many Labs 4 couldn\u2019t replicate the key worldview-defense effect; several high-powered failures followed; defenders say nulls are over-interpreted. What counts","canonical_url":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/?p=163811","robots":"max-image-preview:large","keywords":"","webmasterTools":{"google-site-verification":"HMjuOfLRyzTPB-5Z5FG4BHkfZ1fbEij34rmbKM3BkZ4","miscellaneous":""},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"BlogPosting","@id":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/?p=163811#blogposting","name":"The Legacy of Ernest Becker: Death, Ideologies, and Cultures - Luke Ford","headline":"The Legacy of Ernest Becker: Death, Ideologies, and Cultures","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/?author=1#author"},"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/#person"},"image":{"@type":"ImageObject","@id":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/?p=163811#articleImage","url":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/wp-content\/litespeed\/avatar\/af8ecf5ef66099147247f500ec429b38.jpg?ver=1784204923","width":96,"height":96,"caption":"Luke Ford"},"datePublished":"2025-09-24T21:37:22-08:00","dateModified":"2025-09-25T05:34:20-08:00","inLanguage":"en-US","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/?p=163811#webpage"},"isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/?p=163811#webpage"},"articleSection":"Psychology"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/?p=163811#breadcrumblist","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","@id":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog#listItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog","nextItem":{"@type":"ListItem","@id":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/?cat=17382#listItem","name":"Psychology"}},{"@type":"ListItem","@id":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/?cat=17382#listItem","position":2,"name":"Psychology","item":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/?cat=17382","nextItem":{"@type":"ListItem","@id":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/?p=163811#listItem","name":"The Legacy of Ernest Becker: Death, Ideologies, and Cultures"},"previousItem":{"@type":"ListItem","@id":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog#listItem","name":"Home"}},{"@type":"ListItem","@id":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/?p=163811#listItem","position":3,"name":"The Legacy of Ernest Becker: Death, Ideologies, and Cultures","previousItem":{"@type":"ListItem","@id":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/?cat=17382#listItem","name":"Psychology"}}]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/#person","name":"Luke Ford","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","@id":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/?p=163811#personImage","url":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/wp-content\/litespeed\/avatar\/af8ecf5ef66099147247f500ec429b38.jpg?ver=1784204923","width":96,"height":96,"caption":"Luke Ford"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/?author=1#author","url":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/?author=1","name":"Luke Ford","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","@id":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/?p=163811#authorImage","url":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/wp-content\/litespeed\/avatar\/af8ecf5ef66099147247f500ec429b38.jpg?ver=1784204923","width":96,"height":96,"caption":"Luke Ford"}},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/?p=163811#webpage","url":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/?p=163811","name":"The Legacy of Ernest Becker: Death, Ideologies, and Cultures - Luke Ford","description":"I asked ChatGPT to decode this Youtube video for talking points for my big Sunday show: Use Terror Management Theory (TMT) as the case study. Walk through the classic mortality-salience experiments, then the replication crisis: Many Labs 4 couldn\u2019t replicate the key worldview-defense effect; several high-powered failures followed; defenders say nulls are over-interpreted. What counts","inLanguage":"en-US","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/#website"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/?p=163811#breadcrumblist"},"author":{"@id":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/?author=1#author"},"creator":{"@id":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/?author=1#author"},"datePublished":"2025-09-24T21:37:22-08:00","dateModified":"2025-09-25T05:34:20-08:00"},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/","name":"Luke Ford","alternateName":"No Sacred Cows","description":"No sacred cows.","inLanguage":"en-US","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/#person"}}]},"og:locale":"en_US","og:site_name":"Luke Ford - No sacred cows.","og:type":"article","og:title":"The Legacy of Ernest Becker: Death, Ideologies, and Cultures - Luke Ford","og:description":"I asked ChatGPT to decode this Youtube video for talking points for my big Sunday show: Use Terror Management Theory (TMT) as the case study. Walk through the classic mortality-salience experiments, then the replication crisis: Many Labs 4 couldn\u2019t replicate the key worldview-defense effect; several high-powered failures followed; defenders say nulls are over-interpreted. What counts","og:url":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/?p=163811","og:image":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/lukesanta.jpg","og:image:secure_url":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/lukesanta.jpg","og:image:width":800,"og:image:height":600,"article:published_time":"2025-09-25T05:37:22+00:00","article:modified_time":"2025-09-25T13:34:20+00:00","article:publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/lukecford","twitter:card":"summary_large_image","twitter:site":"@lukeford","twitter:title":"The Legacy of Ernest Becker: Death, Ideologies, and Cultures - Luke Ford","twitter:description":"I asked ChatGPT to decode this Youtube video for talking points for my big Sunday show: Use Terror Management Theory (TMT) as the case study. Walk through the classic mortality-salience experiments, then the replication crisis: Many Labs 4 couldn\u2019t replicate the key worldview-defense effect; several high-powered failures followed; defenders say nulls are over-interpreted. What counts","twitter:creator":"@lukeford","twitter:image":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/lukesanta.jpg"},"aioseo_meta_data":{"post_id":"163811","title":null,"description":null,"keywords":null,"keyphrases":{"focus":{"keyphrase":"","score":0,"analysis":{"keyphraseInTitle":{"score":0,"maxScore":9,"error":1}}},"additional":[]},"primary_term":null,"canonical_url":null,"og_title":null,"og_description":null,"og_object_type":"default","og_image_type":"default","og_image_url":null,"og_image_width":null,"og_image_height":null,"og_image_custom_url":null,"og_image_custom_fields":null,"og_video":"","og_custom_url":null,"og_article_section":null,"og_article_tags":null,"twitter_use_og":false,"twitter_card":"default","twitter_image_type":"default","twitter_image_url":null,"twitter_image_custom_url":null,"twitter_image_custom_fields":null,"twitter_title":null,"twitter_description":null,"schema":{"blockGraphs":[],"customGraphs":[],"default":{"data":{"Article":[],"Course":[],"Dataset":[],"FAQPage":[],"Movie":[],"Person":[],"Product":[],"ProductReview":[],"Car":[],"Recipe":[],"Service":[],"SoftwareApplication":[],"WebPage":[]},"graphName":"BlogPosting","isEnabled":true},"graphs":[]},"schema_type":"default","schema_type_options":null,"pillar_content":false,"robots_default":true,"robots_noindex":false,"robots_noarchive":false,"robots_nosnippet":false,"robots_nofollow":false,"robots_noimageindex":false,"robots_noodp":false,"robots_notranslate":false,"robots_max_snippet":"-1","robots_max_videopreview":"-1","robots_max_imagepreview":"large","priority":null,"frequency":"default","local_seo":null,"breadcrumb_settings":null,"limit_modified_date":false,"ai":{"faqs":[],"keyPoints":[],"titles":[],"descriptions":[],"socialPosts":{"email":[],"linkedin":[],"twitter":[],"facebook":[],"instagram":[]}},"created":"2025-09-24 15:38:53","updated":"2025-09-25 13:48:36","seo_analyzer_scan_date":null},"aioseo_breadcrumb":"<div class=\"aioseo-breadcrumbs\"><span class=\"aioseo-breadcrumb\">\n\t\t\t<a href=\"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\" title=\"Home\">Home<\/a>\n\t\t<\/span><span class=\"aioseo-breadcrumb-separator\">&raquo;<\/span><span class=\"aioseo-breadcrumb\">\n\t\t\t<a href=\"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/?cat=17382\" title=\"Psychology\">Psychology<\/a>\n\t\t<\/span><span class=\"aioseo-breadcrumb-separator\">&raquo;<\/span><span class=\"aioseo-breadcrumb\">\n\t\t\tThe Legacy of Ernest Becker: Death, Ideologies, and Cultures\n\t\t<\/span><\/div>","aioseo_breadcrumb_json":[{"label":"Home","link":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog"},{"label":"Psychology","link":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/?cat=17382"},{"label":"The Legacy of Ernest Becker: Death, Ideologies, and Cultures","link":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/?p=163811"}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/163811","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=163811"}],"version-history":[{"count":10,"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/163811\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":163882,"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/163811\/revisions\/163882"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=163811"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=163811"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=163811"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}