{"id":158582,"date":"2025-01-14T19:45:05","date_gmt":"2025-01-15T03:45:05","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/?p=158582"},"modified":"2025-01-14T19:45:05","modified_gmt":"2025-01-15T03:45:05","slug":"lat-l-a-fire-officials-could-have-put-engines-in-the-palisades-before-the-fire-broke-out-they-didnt","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/?p=158582","title":{"rendered":"LAT: L.A. fire officials could have put engines in the Palisades before the fire broke out. They didn\u2019t"},"content":{"rendered":"

Kudos to the Los Angeles Times for this important story<\/a>:<\/p>\n

As the Los Angeles Fire Department faced extraordinary warnings of life-threatening winds, top commanders decided not to assign for emergency deployment roughly 1,000 available firefighters and dozens of water-carrying engines in advance of the fire that destroyed much of the Pacific Palisades and continues to burn, interviews and internal LAFD records show.<\/p>\n

Fire officials chose not to order the firefighters to remain on duty for a second shift last Tuesday as the winds were building \u2014 which would have doubled the personnel on hand \u2014 and staffed just five of more than 40 engines that are available to aid in battling wildfires…<\/p>\n

The department only started calling up more firefighters and deploying those additional engines after the Palisades blaze was burning out of control…<\/p>\n

Over the past several days, Crowley and other officials have given The Times varying accounts of how many engines were available to supplement regular deployments. An internal planning document obtained by The Times from a source showed that the department said \u201cno\u201d to deploying an additional nine engines, known as \u201cready reserve\u201d engines, to fire-prone areas. Those are different from the nine engines that were pre-positioned in the Valley and Hollywood.<\/p>\n

Crowley initially told The Times that most of the ready reserve engines were inoperable or otherwise unavailable. Later, however, a spokesperson for Crowley said just four of the nine were not immediately available. A third official then produced a document that said seven were put into service at one point or another \u2014 most of them after the fire ignited.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Kudos to the Los Angeles Times for this important story: As the Los Angeles Fire Department faced extraordinary warnings of life-threatening winds, top commanders decided not to assign for emergency deployment roughly 1,000 available firefighters and dozens of water-carrying engines … Continue reading →<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"om_disable_all_campaigns":false,"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[50],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-158582","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-los-angeles"],"aioseo_notices":[],"aioseo_head":"\n\t\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t