{"id":157628,"date":"2024-10-08T03:51:26","date_gmt":"2024-10-08T11:51:26","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/?p=157628"},"modified":"2024-10-13T04:45:38","modified_gmt":"2024-10-13T12:45:38","slug":"the-embodied-expression-of-the-elite-attitude","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/?p=157628","title":{"rendered":"The Embodied Expression Of The Elite Attitude"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>In his Oct. 7, 2024 &#8220;Israel Update&#8221; video with the Hudson Institute&#8217;s Middle East analyst <A HREF=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Michael_Scott_Doran\">Michael Doran<\/a>, <A HREF=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Gadi_Taub\">right-wing Israeli historian Gadi Taub<\/a> selected this as his dumbest media commentary moment of the week: &#8220;[Journalist] <A HREF=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Ilana_Dayan\">Ilana Dayan<\/a> speaking on CNN to <A HREF=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Christiane_Amanpour\">Christiane Amanpour<\/a> who asked her about the horrible death tall in Gaza including she said 16,000 innocent children&#8230; Ilana Dayan is trying to explain why she is under such a strong impression of October 7 that she primarily sees that, but she confesses Israel does not cover Gaza&#8217;s suffering enough. this is how our elites are &#8212; the supplicants of progressive elites elsewhere because what any sane Israeli journalist, and there are very few of these, should have said is that why are you asking me when these [Hamas] people are deliberately using their children as human shields and then you want me to take responsibility for that? These [Israeli] elites are looking up to elites [elsewhere], their their sense of solidarity and belonging is closer to elites in other countries than they are to their own people and this becomes especially poignant since they think of themselves as provincials and they want to rise up to the tier of the metropolitan elites where the real elites are, the real cultured people are Christian Amanpour, who are the real people with a moral compass, so they end up kissing the feet of anti-semites and playing to CNN biases with which are tinged with with anti-Semitism. This is not just a dumb take on the news, this is infuriating. Ilana Dayan is called the Barbara Walters of of Israeli TV so she&#8217;s the dean of highbrow journalism and she has the fanciest Israeli accent with the knitted brows and and the thoughtful look in her eyes and the rimless glasses, she&#8217;s like the epitome of intelligence and conscience and yet what she does in the end when faced with something like that is she grovels at the feet of a nasty CNN anchor.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Michael Doran: &#8220;I need to get a knitted brow and rimless glasses. I&#8217;ve never mastered that look &#8212; thoughtful, pensive.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>This discourse by Gadi Taub made me wonder if there are certain physical manifestations of the elite point of view and of the counter-elite view. Take Tucker Carlson for example. I can\u2019t think of any elite commentator who makes Tucker\u2019s dramatic facial postures. Could we detect who has the elite worldview vs the counter-elite worldview just by looking at someone without listening to anything they\u2019re saying? Did Tucker\u2019s expressions change as he became more populist?<\/p>\n<p>Tucker today presents himself differently from the Tucker of the 2000s. He no longer wears a bowtie. He\u2019s more dramatic now and he pulls more funny faces.<\/p>\n<p><iframe width=\"560\" height=\"315\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/NVdn_zYcINA?si=VxxXmKq_2yxmn5KO\" title=\"YouTube video player\" frameborder=\"0\" allow=\"accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share\" referrerpolicy=\"strict-origin-when-cross-origin\" allowfullscreen><\/iframe><\/p>\n<p>Ilana Dayan:<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/IlanaDayan.jpg\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/IlanaDayan-300x123.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"300\" height=\"123\" class=\"alignnone size-medium wp-image-157637\" srcset=\"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/IlanaDayan-300x123.jpg 300w, https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/IlanaDayan-1024x421.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/IlanaDayan-768x316.jpg 768w, https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/IlanaDayan-1536x631.jpg 1536w, https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/IlanaDayan.jpg 1755w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>This discourse by Gadi Taub made me wonder if there are certain physical manifestations of the elite point of view and of the counter-elite view. Take Tucker Carlson for example. I can&#8217;t think of any elite commentator who makes Tucker&#8217;s dramatic facial postures. Could we detect who has the elite worldview vs the counter-elite worldview just by looking at someone without listening to anything they&#8217;re saying? Did Tucker&#8217;s expressions change as he became more populist?<\/p>\n<p>Tucker the Populist:<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/tucker.jpg\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/tucker-300x152.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"300\" height=\"152\" class=\"alignnone size-medium wp-image-157642\" srcset=\"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/tucker-300x152.jpg 300w, https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/tucker-1024x517.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/tucker-768x388.jpg 768w, https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/tucker-1536x776.jpg 1536w, https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/tucker.jpg 1754w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>Tucker today presents himself differently from the Tucker of the 2000s. He no longer wears a bowtie. He&#8217;s more flamboyant and he pulls more funny faces today. <\/p>\n<p>Here are some photos of Tucker when he co-hosted the CNN show Crossfire:<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/CrossfireTucker.jpg\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/CrossfireTucker-300x153.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"300\" height=\"153\" class=\"alignnone size-medium wp-image-157644\" srcset=\"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/CrossfireTucker-300x153.jpg 300w, https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/CrossfireTucker-1024x523.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/CrossfireTucker-768x392.jpg 768w, https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/CrossfireTucker-1536x785.jpg 1536w, https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/CrossfireTucker.jpg 1762w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>In the Alexander Technique world, I heard the intriguing idea that each emotion requires a particular alignment of our musculature, and without that alignment, we can&#8217;t access the emotion. To feel depressed, for example, there needs to be a depression of one&#8217;s muscular alignment in the direction of a sag. To feel joy, you need an upward direction in your alignment, and so on. Each thought requires an increased level of muscular tension. You can&#8217;t think through an idea without having more muscular tension than when you are not doing mental work. <\/p>\n<p>Are the gestures of populist politicians more flamboyant than those of establishment politicians? Nigel Farage and Donald Trump, for example, seem more expressive than normal pols. <\/p>\n<p>Nigel Farage:<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/nigelfarage.jpg\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/nigelfarage-300x151.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"300\" height=\"151\" class=\"alignnone size-medium wp-image-157649\" srcset=\"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/nigelfarage-300x151.jpg 300w, https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/nigelfarage-1024x516.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/nigelfarage-768x387.jpg 768w, https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/nigelfarage-1536x774.jpg 1536w, https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/nigelfarage.jpg 1754w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>Donald Trump:<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/donaldtrump1.jpg\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/donaldtrump1-300x153.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"300\" height=\"153\" class=\"alignnone size-medium wp-image-157650\" srcset=\"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/donaldtrump1-300x153.jpg 300w, https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/donaldtrump1-1024x522.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/donaldtrump1-768x391.jpg 768w, https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/donaldtrump1-1536x783.jpg 1536w, https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/donaldtrump1.jpg 1750w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>Is there a cognitive and physiological change when you change your politics? Does embracing a particular politics develop a certain physiological reaction? Is there a correlation or a causation between one&#8217;s politics and one&#8217;s physiology? <\/p>\n<p>After the presidential debates of June 27 and September 10, and the vice-presidential debate of October 1, there was much discussion in conservative circles about the mannerisms of the TV anchors. They were variously described as smug, constipated and stilted. These states are a reflection of a physiological state. <\/p>\n<p>I am curious about the embodiment of the conservative and liberal worldviews. Between ages 19 and 22, I flirted with Marxism, and I recollect that I experienced a different physiology during those times that I imagined that Marxism was truth. On the other hand, I&#8217;ve been more extremely right-wing and racist than I am now, and I think I experienced a different physiology in those extreme states. <\/p>\n<p>I think I can usually tell somebody&#8217;s politics by his physiognomy. Physiognomy might have some relationship to certain cognitive and physiological patterns. <\/p>\n<p><iframe width=\"560\" height=\"315\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/3N-KwSKIhCo?si=-xsl1TjP6kj0001m\" title=\"YouTube video player\" frameborder=\"0\" allow=\"accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share\" referrerpolicy=\"strict-origin-when-cross-origin\" allowfullscreen><\/iframe><\/p>\n<p>Fox News anchor John Roberts <A HREF=\"https:\/\/thehill.com\/homenews\/media\/4913675-fox-news-john-roberts-margaret-brennan-jd-vance-vp-debate\/\">said<\/a> about moderator Margaret Brennan&#8217;s performance at the VP debate: &#8220;That was a rather snide, condescending sneer I thought that Margaret Brennan had when she said, &#8216;Thank you for explaining the legal process.'&#8221;<\/p>\n<p><A HREF=\"https:\/\/www.yahoo.com\/news\/cbs-debate-moderators-pummeled-obnoxious-124610535.html\">Fox News reported Oct. 2<\/a>:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>\nThe fact-checking by the CBS moderators was slammed by critics.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;The moderators were obnoxious and made it feel like three on one on Vance,&#8221; Fox News&#8217; Brit Hume reacted.<\/p>\n<p>Fox News&#8217; Laura Ingraham called out the &#8220;smug, arrogant bias&#8221; of the moderators.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Almost every question was designed to make Republicans look bad, slanting Trump\u2019s views on childcare. And yet Vance seemed to take it all in stride. And he really, I think, with most questions, really showed his humanity and also his knowledge of the issues,&#8221; Ingraham said.<\/p>\n<p>Notably, O&#8217;Donnell and Brennan cooled off on the fact-checking after they returned from the commercial break.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><A HREF=\"https:\/\/ronyguldmann.com\/pdfviewer\/conservative-claims-of-cultural-oppression\/\">Rony Guldmann writes in his work-in-progress Conservative Claims of Cultural Oppression<\/a>:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>What liberalism upholds as autonomous self-possession is in fact the internalization of the new restraints and inhibitions of the disciplinary society.  The modern liberal identity is not an unvarnished naturalistic lucidity, as liberals are wont to see it.  For it embodies the contingent historical forces that first generated it, a new uniformization, homogenization, and rationalization that liberalism\u2019s Enlightenment narratives conceal or discount.  These narratives trace our modern \u201cinnerness\u201d to a certain psychic liberation  from  blind convention.    But  they  overlook  that  this innerness is a kind of blind convention in its own right, the outcome of the disciplinary molding that quietly undergirds liberal ideals.<\/p>\n<p>* Here is the \u201chigher truth\u201d at which conservative claims of cultural oppression are always intimating.  Liberals may be the ones who most ardently defend science and naturalism, but it is conservatives who are the more viscerally naturalistic at the primordial level of embodied human experience,  where  the  dualisms  by  which  liberals  would  distinguish  their  principled  high-mindedness  from  conservatives\u2019  hidebound  prejudice  and  egoism  become  untenable.    What liberals dismiss as the politically opportunistic swiping of progressive lingo reflects conservatives\u2019 more  naturalistic, less  rationalistic  understanding of  human  beings  in  general  and  liberals  in particular, their profound sense that liberalism\u2019s official rational morality grows out of a pre-rational  identity  that  is being  imposed  alongside  what  purports  to  be  moral  idealism  pure  and simple.    Liberals  cannot  see  the  broader  context  of  their  idealism  because  their  antiquated Enlightenment view of reason as predominantly conscious and disembodied leaves them insensible to this layer of human experience, and so over confident of their  ability to recognize oppression and  inequality.    The  conscious  categories  through  which  they  would  distinguish  their  own cosmopolitan idealism from the narrow parochialism of conservatives can capture only a fraction of  what  transpires  at  the  deeper  level  of  our  unconscious  functioning,  in  the  merely  animal  of human nature, where liberalism\u2019s neutral abstractions lose all meaning.  This is what the symbolic grievances are ultimately symbolic of.  <\/p>\n<p>*  individualism  and  free-spiritedness  that  are  in  truth  more  greatly embodied by conservatives.<\/p>\n<p>* ideas must be understood in the context of their pre-theoretical psycho-cultural embodiments, in forms of lived experience of which political ideas are merely one expression.  David Gelernter captures this thought in proposing that ideology \u201cis a projection of your personality.\u201d  It is \u201cyou cast like a spotlight onto the cultural landscape in which you live.\u201d Liberalism and conservatism are not just opposing ideas, but also opposing ways of being, different \u201cspotlights,\u201d each giving resonance to certain ideas and not others.  Political ideology is not just a cluster of principles through which events in the  world are self-consciously  conceptualized, but, like personality generally, the lens through which the world first appears to us prior to explicit belief-formation. The conviction that liberals and conservatives are divided by \u201cindelible psychological differences\u201d originates in just this epistemology&#8230;<\/p>\n<p>* conservatives\u2019 greater sensitivity to liberalism\u2019s status as a physiologically embodied ethos, to what Pierre Bourdieu calls the \u201cimperceptible cues of bodily hexis [disposition].\u201d Bodily hexis,  Bourdieu explains, is \u201cpolitical  mythology  realized, em-bodied,  turned  into  a  permanent  disposition,  a durable manner of standing, speaking, and thereby of feeling and thinking.\u201d That disposition constitutes a \u201cpattern of postures that is both individual and systematic\u201d and which, \u201ccharged with a host of social meanings and values,\u201d permits these \u201cto pass from practice  to  practice  without going through discourse or consciousness.\u201d Our pre-verbal  comportment  can  carry political significance because  it  is the  physiological  and  instinctual  embodiment of  what  is  only later reflected  upon  as  ideas.   This  liberal-looking  girl\u2019s  \u201ccoy  smile,\u201d then,  may  be but  the temperamental  and  physiological  embodiment of  her  overall worldview.<\/p>\n<p>* Hellen Rittelmeyer explains that her cohort at Yale \u201csmoked on principle\u201d and were bothered by smoking bans, which undeservedly \u201cgave the modern cult of health the force of law.\u201d  Reacting to this, she and her friends chose to embody conservative values rather than articulate them, which is what smoking enabled them to do.  For reasons they never quite understood, \u201csmoking felt like rebellion against Yale\u2019s moral consensus that the two most important things in life are for everyone to be happy and for everyone to get along.<\/p>\n<p>* Christopher Lasch explains the intuition:  &#8220;Upper-middle-class liberals, with their inability to grasp the importance of class differences in shaping attitudes toward life, fail to reckon with the class dimension of their obsession with health and moral uplift.  They find it hard to understand why their hygienic conception of life fails to command universal enthusiasm.  They have mounted a crusade to sanitize American  society:  to  create  a  \u201csmoke-free  environment,\u201d  to  censor  everything  from pornography to \u201chate speech,\u201d and at the same time, incongruously, to extend the range of personal  choice  in  matters  where  most  people  feel  the  need  of solid  moral  guidelines.  When confronted with resistance to these initiatives, they betray the venomous hatred that lies not far beneath the smiling face of upper-middle-class benevolence.&#8221; Conservatives  can  see  themselves  as  generally more  tolerant  than  liberals  because  they  equate liberalism with a \u201chygienic conception of life\u201d that variously manifests itself in a wide range of spheres.  Smoking can qualify as a political act because it is a rebellion against this conception, which liberals seek to impose on the rest of us.<\/p>\n<p>* it is liberalism qua social identity, qua automatic social reflex, that has been culturally credentialed as the embodiment of a privileged intellectual acuity.  Just as the classic finishing schools strove to inculcate a certain physical posture, so the elite universities now inculcate a certain mental and spiritual posture through which to announce oneself curious, broad-minded,  given  to scientific  detachment and  dispassionate  analysis, etc.\u2014that  is,  as  a member of the anointed in good standing.<\/p>\n<p>* There  is  no  inconsistency  if conservatives suspend  their  usual  hostility to government whenever it comes to military spending.  Given that the military embodies Strict Father values\u2014\u201chierarchical authority, self-discipline, building strength, and fighting evils\u201d\u2014it can be publicly subsidized without offending those values.49Educationspending, on the other hand, is wasteful, because educators are mostly nurturers standing in the way of Strict Father morality.50Likewise, conservatives support  the  freedom  to own guns  while  opposing  the  freedom to  abort  a  fetus because \u201c[g]uns are seen as the individual\u2019s form of protection in a hostile world,\u201d as \u201csymbolic of  the  male  role  as  family  protector.\u201d51By  contrast, abortion symbolizes corrupting  parental indulgence, a child\u2019s failure to \u201clearn from  her  mistakes,\u201d or a woman\u2019s preference for  career above motherhood\u2014all affronts to Strict Father morality.52The difference between liberals and conservatives isn\u2019t that one party is more true to its professed ideals, but that these ideals\u2019 concrete meaning and application is being determined by opposed familial metaphors and moralities.<\/p>\n<p>* Strict  Father  morality  as described by  Lakoff embodies the  pre-modern conviction that individual and  communal flourishing depend on upholding some wider order of things, and  that  this  dependency can justify  action against  those threatening that  order.   The ostensible concerns of conservatives are modern, but the deeper impetus behind the concerns is, in a  way,  pre-modern.    The goal isn\u2019t just to  uphold  certain  conduct,  but  to  uphold  the  order  that sustains that conduct. This is why deviation \u201cgoes beyond mere immorality,\u201d as Lakoff says. The teleological hierarchies of pre-moderns had an ever-present religious foundation.  But religion for Lakoff is only one outle tfor conservatives\u2019 devotion to \u201cMoral Order.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>* While all emotions carry the potential to distort our grasp of reality, [liberal Martha] Nussbaum argues that disgust is  distorting  in  its  essence. For  moralized  disgust  involves  externalizing  our  primal  sense  of animal vulnerability onto social outsiders, turning them into embodiments of the human frailty we would  like  to  deny  in  ourselves.   Whereas  anger  can  in  principle  track  real danger  in  a  reliable way,  disgust  is  intrinsically unreasonable,  embodying  \u201cmagical  ideas of  contamination,  and impossible  aspirations  to  purity,  immortality,  and  non-animality,  that  are  just  not  in  line  with human life as we know it.\u201d69The attempt to control or contain what become seen as contaminated persons is a  form  of  magical, atavistic  thinking&#8230;<\/p>\n<p>* The strategic self-understanding expresses what Taylor calls \u201cthat recurrent figure which our civilization aspires to realize, the disembodied ego, the subject who  can objectify all being, including his own,\u201d and thereby achieve \u201ctotal self-possession.\u201d Such  self-possession is an impossible aspiration, however.<\/p>\n<p>* by way of these social understandings\u2014and not any disengaged and disembodied inner self\u2014that our identities are first revealed to us.  Since these understandings embody shared social relations, they ultimately refer us to our place within a larger order, without which we cannot be ourselves.  If individuals  cannot  readily  alter  social  meanings  at  will,  this  is  because  that  very  will  originates from out of those meanings. The total self-possession of the strategic agent is illusory because our \u201cmine-ness\u201d and the field of significances toward which it is always \u201copened out\u201d each permeate the other&#8230; Meaning is first encountered in the world, not in our disembodied interiority, which has itself been created by a social world that \u201ccalls on us\u201d to think and act as individuals.<\/p>\n<p>* The strategic conception of the human agent is naturalistic inasmuch as it seems to free us from any untenably  anthropocentric  teleological  commitments.    But it  is also in  tension  with naturalism  inasmuch as it  conceals  the  culturally embodied nature of human consciousness. <\/p>\n<p>* Liberals will characterize the prejudice of conservatives as a failure of \u201cenlightenment,\u201d the symptom of irrational animus.  But what is called \u201cprejudice\u201d is more primordially a failure to transcend ordinary embodied perception toward  a  higher  state  of  spiritual  purity  and  freedom, a  failure to  adopt  the  sort of  emotional asceticism  that  would  enable this transcendence.<\/p>\n<p>* an inextinguishable  drunkenness  is  being  concealed  behind what gets passed off as a mere love of reality. It is a particular form of spirituality, not disembodied intellectual rigor, that impels liberals to highlight America\u2019s historical moral failings at the expense of its moral achievements, to judge America\u2019s record by a standard higher than is applied to other nations,  and  higher  than  the  history of  the  human  race  indicates is  reasonable.   This  is  why conservatives feel, with Kahane, that the Left has \u201cmade America\u2019s entire history hostage to the legacy of slavery\u201d and highlights America\u2019s failings in order to \u201cinvalidate any aspect of your culture\u201d whenever it chooses.133That culture must be invalidated because it is incompatible with the secularized  asceticism which the  elites seek to institutionalize as \u201cthoughtfulness,\u201d which is yet another weapon in the arsenal of liberal ideology&#8230;<\/p>\n<p>* The ultimate prestige symbol, propagated as the subtext of all the derivative ones, is the ideal of the  disengaged  subject\u2014\u201cthat  recurrent  figure  which  our  civilization  aspires  to  realize,  the disembodied  ego,  the  subject  who  can  objectify  all  being,  including  his  own.\u201d And  what conservatives really  mean by the \u201cliberal culture\u201d is the civilizational  framework  in which  that figure can make his recurrent appearances.   If conservative claimants of cultural oppression are \u201cuncivilized,\u201d the \u201chalf-savage relics of past times,\u201d this is because they seek, not to realize the ethos of disengaged self-control and self-reflexivity, but to expose it as a cultural pretense\u2014\u201cthe manipulation of prestige symbols\u201d\u2014that  is  untrue  to  what  human  beings,  including  the  liberal elites, are actually like.<\/p>\n<p>* &#8220;CCD [careful critical discourse] treats the relationship between those who speak it, and others about whom they speak, as a relationship between judges and judged.  It implies that the established social hierarchy is only a semblance and the deeper, more important distinction is between those who speak and  understand  truly  and  those  who  do  not.    To  participate  in  the  culture  of  critical discourse,  then,  is  to  be  emancipated at  once from  lowness  in  the  conventional  social hierarchy, and is thus a subversion of that hierarchy.  To participate in the culture of critical discourse, then, is a political act.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>[Conservatives:] Nature was understood to be regulated&#8230; The natural world, and indeed the social world, was seen as embodying, and not just as being caused or affected by, the divine&#8230;<\/p>\n<p>* Religious Reform moved us from an era in where religion was more \u201cembodied\u201d or \u201cenfleshed\u201d to one where it becomes more \u201cin the head.\u201d As Barrett observes, faith in God was originally experienced as a \u201cconcrete mode of being,\u201d as \u201cthe opening up of one being toward another.\u201d Only later in the modern  era  did  it  become \u201cpropositional,\u201d an intellectual  assent to  statements,  creeds,  and systems.69Only  at  this  point  did religion become  strongly  associated  with thinking  and  acting rightly.  And this meant disciplining away people\u2019s sense that they were opened out to forces that can suffuse their very being, turning them into vessels of an unpredictable higher power.  An earlier Christianity  had  made  its  compromises  with  paganism  and  its  embodied,  undisciplined,  and unreflective forms of spirituality.  But the religious reformers  were now  demanding a  complete break with this past.<\/p>\n<p>And so what was formerly the essence of religion was now condemned as sinful pride. The true  faith  had  become excarnated,  propositional  religion.    And  the  embodied religious feeling through  which  the  sacred  was  formerly  accessed  by  Christians  and  pagans  alike  became stigmatized as mere sensuality and impulse, a threat to religious clarity.<\/p>\n<p>* If  public  policymaking cannot be permitted to fall into the hands of the American people, this is because the American people refuse the buffered distance, because they are too mired in their unreflective folkways and too indulgent of their embodied religious feelings to accede to the civilizing process that liberals feel they must spread to them. <\/p>\n<p>* The elites are despised because they have become the symbolic embodiments of the buffered identity. Correlatively, this  resentment also fuels conservatives\u2019 powerful sense of their  own  authenticity,  of  their  special  insight  into liberalism\u2019s  campaign  of  \u201cstealth  and subterfuge,\u201d and  the  accompanying  conviction  that liberals\u2019 verbal  eloquence  is too  glib  and shallow  to  grasp the  deeper  layers  of  meaning  to  which  they  are  attuned.<\/p>\n<p>* The patriotism of conservatives consists in their surrender to the embodied feelings of the higher which the disciplines and repressions of the buffered identity seek to extirpate.  This is the threat they see coming from unpatriotic liberal elites.  It is the reason why John Kerry derived so little political mileage from his Vietnam War record in his 2004 presidential run.  His persona was quintessentially   buffered\u2014\u201chaughty,   French-looking\u201d  and  marked  by  an  \u201cout-of-touch aristocratic bearing\u201d as Anderson puts it.65And this vitiated everything else in the eyes of more porous  Americans.    If  the  liberal  elites  are,  as conservatives complain, \u201cout of touch\u201d with the lived experience of \u201cordinary Americans,\u201d this is a detachment, not from their empirical condition, but from their cosmological orientation. The liberal identity is premised on the ethos of disengaged self-control  and self-reflexivity, and this places it in direct conflict with those whose patriotism resists that ethos. Liberals will insist that their patriotism is the reflective patriotism of ideals and principles rather than the unreflective patriotism of blood, soil, and language&#8230;<\/p>\n<p>* worship of ignorance is merely a means of  opposing  the  buffered distance and its disciplinary impulses.  Given that intellectuals and experts are among the foremost embodiments   of   these   impulses,   they   are   natural   targets   for   conservatives, for   whom intellectualism and expertise are just further emanations of an all-pervasive liberalism that must be opposed on every front. <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In his Oct. 7, 2024 &#8220;Israel Update&#8221; video with the Hudson Institute&#8217;s Middle East analyst Michael Doran, right-wing Israeli historian Gadi Taub selected this as his dumbest media commentary moment of the week: &#8220;[Journalist] Ilana Dayan speaking on CNN to &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/?p=157628\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"om_disable_all_campaigns":false,"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[201,42962,37,20,29740,211,24,42848],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-157628","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-conservatives","category-gaza","category-israel","category-journalism","category-liberal","category-libertarian","category-politics","category-populism"],"aioseo_notices":[],"aioseo_head":"\n\t\t<!-- All in One SEO 4.9.10 - aioseo.com -->\n\t<meta name=\"description\" content=\"In his Oct. 7, 2024 &quot;Israel Update&quot; video with the Hudson Institute&#039;s Middle East analyst Michael Doran, right-wing Israeli historian Gadi Taub selected this as his dumbest media commentary moment of the week: &quot;[Journalist] Ilana Dayan speaking on CNN to Christiane Amanpour who asked her about the horrible death tall in Gaza including she said\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"max-image-preview:large\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Luke Ford\"\/>\n\t<meta name=\"google-site-verification\" content=\"HMjuOfLRyzTPB-5Z5FG4BHkfZ1fbEij34rmbKM3BkZ4\" \/>\n\t<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/?p=157628\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"generator\" content=\"All in One SEO (AIOSEO) 4.9.10\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Luke Ford - No sacred cows.\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"The Embodied Expression Of The Elite Attitude - Luke Ford\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"In his Oct. 7, 2024 &quot;Israel Update&quot; video with the Hudson Institute&#039;s Middle East analyst Michael Doran, right-wing Israeli historian Gadi Taub selected this as his dumbest media commentary moment of the week: &quot;[Journalist] Ilana Dayan speaking on CNN to Christiane Amanpour who asked her about the horrible death tall in Gaza including she said\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/?p=157628\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/lukesanta.jpg\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"og:image:secure_url\" content=\"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/lukesanta.jpg\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"800\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"600\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2024-10-08T11:51:26+00:00\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-10-13T12:45:38+00:00\" \/>\n\t\t<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/lukecford\" \/>\n\t\t<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n\t\t<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@lukeford\" \/>\n\t\t<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"The Embodied Expression Of The Elite Attitude - Luke Ford\" \/>\n\t\t<meta name=\"twitter:description\" content=\"In his Oct. 7, 2024 &quot;Israel Update&quot; video with the Hudson Institute&#039;s Middle East analyst Michael Doran, right-wing Israeli historian Gadi Taub selected this as his dumbest media commentary moment of the week: &quot;[Journalist] Ilana Dayan speaking on CNN to Christiane Amanpour who asked her about the horrible death tall in Gaza including she said\" \/>\n\t\t<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@lukeford\" \/>\n\t\t<meta name=\"twitter:image\" content=\"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/lukesanta.jpg\" \/>\n\t\t<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"aioseo-schema\">\n\t\t\t{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"BlogPosting\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lukeford.net\\\/blog\\\/?p=157628#blogposting\",\"name\":\"The Embodied Expression Of The Elite Attitude - Luke Ford\",\"headline\":\"The Embodied Expression Of The Elite Attitude\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lukeford.net\\\/blog\\\/?author=1#author\"},\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lukeford.net\\\/blog\\\/#person\"},\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lukeford.net\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/10\\\/IlanaDayan.jpg\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lukeford.net\\\/blog\\\/?p=157628\\\/#articleImage\",\"width\":1755,\"height\":721},\"datePublished\":\"2024-10-08T03:51:26-08:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-10-13T04:45:38-08:00\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lukeford.net\\\/blog\\\/?p=157628#webpage\"},\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lukeford.net\\\/blog\\\/?p=157628#webpage\"},\"articleSection\":\"Conservatives, Gaza, Israel, Journalism, Liberal, Libertarian, Politics, Populism\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lukeford.net\\\/blog\\\/?p=157628#breadcrumblist\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lukeford.net\\\/blog#listItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lukeford.net\\\/blog\",\"nextItem\":{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lukeford.net\\\/blog\\\/?cat=20#listItem\",\"name\":\"Journalism\"}},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lukeford.net\\\/blog\\\/?cat=20#listItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Journalism\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lukeford.net\\\/blog\\\/?cat=20\",\"nextItem\":{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lukeford.net\\\/blog\\\/?p=157628#listItem\",\"name\":\"The Embodied Expression Of The Elite Attitude\"},\"previousItem\":{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lukeford.net\\\/blog#listItem\",\"name\":\"Home\"}},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lukeford.net\\\/blog\\\/?p=157628#listItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"The Embodied Expression Of The Elite Attitude\",\"previousItem\":{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lukeford.net\\\/blog\\\/?cat=20#listItem\",\"name\":\"Journalism\"}}]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lukeford.net\\\/blog\\\/#person\",\"name\":\"Luke Ford\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lukeford.net\\\/blog\\\/?p=157628#personImage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lukeford.net\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/litespeed\\\/avatar\\\/af8ecf5ef66099147247f500ec429b38.jpg?ver=1784204923\",\"width\":96,\"height\":96,\"caption\":\"Luke Ford\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lukeford.net\\\/blog\\\/?author=1#author\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lukeford.net\\\/blog\\\/?author=1\",\"name\":\"Luke Ford\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lukeford.net\\\/blog\\\/?p=157628#authorImage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lukeford.net\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/litespeed\\\/avatar\\\/af8ecf5ef66099147247f500ec429b38.jpg?ver=1784204923\",\"width\":96,\"height\":96,\"caption\":\"Luke Ford\"}},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lukeford.net\\\/blog\\\/?p=157628#webpage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lukeford.net\\\/blog\\\/?p=157628\",\"name\":\"The Embodied Expression Of The Elite Attitude - Luke Ford\",\"description\":\"In his Oct. 7, 2024 \\\"Israel Update\\\" video with the Hudson Institute's Middle East analyst Michael Doran, right-wing Israeli historian Gadi Taub selected this as his dumbest media commentary moment of the week: \\\"[Journalist] Ilana Dayan speaking on CNN to Christiane Amanpour who asked her about the horrible death tall in Gaza including she said\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lukeford.net\\\/blog\\\/#website\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lukeford.net\\\/blog\\\/?p=157628#breadcrumblist\"},\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lukeford.net\\\/blog\\\/?author=1#author\"},\"creator\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lukeford.net\\\/blog\\\/?author=1#author\"},\"datePublished\":\"2024-10-08T03:51:26-08:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-10-13T04:45:38-08:00\"},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lukeford.net\\\/blog\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lukeford.net\\\/blog\\\/\",\"name\":\"Luke Ford\",\"alternateName\":\"No Sacred Cows\",\"description\":\"No sacred cows.\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lukeford.net\\\/blog\\\/#person\"}}]}\n\t\t<\/script>\n\t\t<!-- All in One SEO -->\n\n","aioseo_head_json":{"title":"The Embodied Expression Of The Elite Attitude - Luke Ford","description":"In his Oct. 7, 2024 \"Israel Update\" video with the Hudson Institute's Middle East analyst Michael Doran, right-wing Israeli historian Gadi Taub selected this as his dumbest media commentary moment of the week: \"[Journalist] Ilana Dayan speaking on CNN to Christiane Amanpour who asked her about the horrible death tall in Gaza including she said","canonical_url":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/?p=157628","robots":"max-image-preview:large","keywords":"","webmasterTools":{"google-site-verification":"HMjuOfLRyzTPB-5Z5FG4BHkfZ1fbEij34rmbKM3BkZ4","miscellaneous":""},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"BlogPosting","@id":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/?p=157628#blogposting","name":"The Embodied Expression Of The Elite Attitude - Luke Ford","headline":"The Embodied Expression Of The Elite Attitude","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/?author=1#author"},"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/#person"},"image":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/IlanaDayan.jpg","@id":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/?p=157628\/#articleImage","width":1755,"height":721},"datePublished":"2024-10-08T03:51:26-08:00","dateModified":"2024-10-13T04:45:38-08:00","inLanguage":"en-US","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/?p=157628#webpage"},"isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/?p=157628#webpage"},"articleSection":"Conservatives, Gaza, Israel, Journalism, Liberal, Libertarian, Politics, Populism"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/?p=157628#breadcrumblist","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","@id":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog#listItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog","nextItem":{"@type":"ListItem","@id":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/?cat=20#listItem","name":"Journalism"}},{"@type":"ListItem","@id":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/?cat=20#listItem","position":2,"name":"Journalism","item":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/?cat=20","nextItem":{"@type":"ListItem","@id":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/?p=157628#listItem","name":"The Embodied Expression Of The Elite Attitude"},"previousItem":{"@type":"ListItem","@id":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog#listItem","name":"Home"}},{"@type":"ListItem","@id":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/?p=157628#listItem","position":3,"name":"The Embodied Expression Of The Elite Attitude","previousItem":{"@type":"ListItem","@id":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/?cat=20#listItem","name":"Journalism"}}]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/#person","name":"Luke Ford","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","@id":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/?p=157628#personImage","url":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/wp-content\/litespeed\/avatar\/af8ecf5ef66099147247f500ec429b38.jpg?ver=1784204923","width":96,"height":96,"caption":"Luke Ford"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/?author=1#author","url":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/?author=1","name":"Luke Ford","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","@id":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/?p=157628#authorImage","url":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/wp-content\/litespeed\/avatar\/af8ecf5ef66099147247f500ec429b38.jpg?ver=1784204923","width":96,"height":96,"caption":"Luke Ford"}},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/?p=157628#webpage","url":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/?p=157628","name":"The Embodied Expression Of The Elite Attitude - Luke Ford","description":"In his Oct. 7, 2024 \"Israel Update\" video with the Hudson Institute's Middle East analyst Michael Doran, right-wing Israeli historian Gadi Taub selected this as his dumbest media commentary moment of the week: \"[Journalist] Ilana Dayan speaking on CNN to Christiane Amanpour who asked her about the horrible death tall in Gaza including she said","inLanguage":"en-US","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/#website"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/?p=157628#breadcrumblist"},"author":{"@id":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/?author=1#author"},"creator":{"@id":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/?author=1#author"},"datePublished":"2024-10-08T03:51:26-08:00","dateModified":"2024-10-13T04:45:38-08:00"},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/","name":"Luke Ford","alternateName":"No Sacred Cows","description":"No sacred cows.","inLanguage":"en-US","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/#person"}}]},"og:locale":"en_US","og:site_name":"Luke Ford - No sacred cows.","og:type":"article","og:title":"The Embodied Expression Of The Elite Attitude - Luke Ford","og:description":"In his Oct. 7, 2024 &quot;Israel Update&quot; video with the Hudson Institute's Middle East analyst Michael Doran, right-wing Israeli historian Gadi Taub selected this as his dumbest media commentary moment of the week: &quot;[Journalist] Ilana Dayan speaking on CNN to Christiane Amanpour who asked her about the horrible death tall in Gaza including she said","og:url":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/?p=157628","og:image":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/lukesanta.jpg","og:image:secure_url":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/lukesanta.jpg","og:image:width":800,"og:image:height":600,"article:published_time":"2024-10-08T11:51:26+00:00","article:modified_time":"2024-10-13T12:45:38+00:00","article:publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/lukecford","twitter:card":"summary_large_image","twitter:site":"@lukeford","twitter:title":"The Embodied Expression Of The Elite Attitude - Luke Ford","twitter:description":"In his Oct. 7, 2024 &quot;Israel Update&quot; video with the Hudson Institute's Middle East analyst Michael Doran, right-wing Israeli historian Gadi Taub selected this as his dumbest media commentary moment of the week: &quot;[Journalist] Ilana Dayan speaking on CNN to Christiane Amanpour who asked her about the horrible death tall in Gaza including she said","twitter:creator":"@lukeford","twitter:image":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/lukesanta.jpg"},"aioseo_meta_data":{"post_id":"157628","title":null,"description":null,"keywords":null,"keyphrases":{"focus":{"keyphrase":"","score":0,"analysis":{"keyphraseInTitle":{"score":0,"maxScore":9,"error":1}}},"additional":[]},"primary_term":null,"canonical_url":null,"og_title":null,"og_description":null,"og_object_type":"default","og_image_type":"default","og_image_url":null,"og_image_width":null,"og_image_height":null,"og_image_custom_url":null,"og_image_custom_fields":null,"og_video":"","og_custom_url":null,"og_article_section":null,"og_article_tags":null,"twitter_use_og":false,"twitter_card":"default","twitter_image_type":"default","twitter_image_url":null,"twitter_image_custom_url":null,"twitter_image_custom_fields":null,"twitter_title":null,"twitter_description":null,"schema":{"blockGraphs":[],"customGraphs":[],"default":{"data":{"Article":[],"Course":[],"Dataset":[],"FAQPage":[],"Movie":[],"Person":[],"Product":[],"ProductReview":[],"Car":[],"Recipe":[],"Service":[],"SoftwareApplication":[],"WebPage":[]},"graphName":"BlogPosting","isEnabled":true},"graphs":[]},"schema_type":"default","schema_type_options":null,"pillar_content":false,"robots_default":true,"robots_noindex":false,"robots_noarchive":false,"robots_nosnippet":false,"robots_nofollow":false,"robots_noimageindex":false,"robots_noodp":false,"robots_notranslate":false,"robots_max_snippet":"-1","robots_max_videopreview":"-1","robots_max_imagepreview":"large","priority":null,"frequency":"default","local_seo":null,"breadcrumb_settings":null,"limit_modified_date":false,"ai":null,"created":"2024-10-08 11:51:26","updated":"2025-06-06 01:36:18","seo_analyzer_scan_date":null},"aioseo_breadcrumb":"<div class=\"aioseo-breadcrumbs\"><span class=\"aioseo-breadcrumb\">\n\t\t\t<a href=\"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\" title=\"Home\">Home<\/a>\n\t\t<\/span><span class=\"aioseo-breadcrumb-separator\">&raquo;<\/span><span class=\"aioseo-breadcrumb\">\n\t\t\t<a href=\"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/?cat=20\" title=\"Journalism\">Journalism<\/a>\n\t\t<\/span><span class=\"aioseo-breadcrumb-separator\">&raquo;<\/span><span class=\"aioseo-breadcrumb\">\n\t\t\tThe Embodied Expression Of The Elite Attitude\n\t\t<\/span><\/div>","aioseo_breadcrumb_json":[{"label":"Home","link":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog"},{"label":"Journalism","link":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/?cat=20"},{"label":"The Embodied Expression Of The Elite Attitude","link":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/?p=157628"}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/157628","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=157628"}],"version-history":[{"count":31,"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/157628\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":157675,"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/157628\/revisions\/157675"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=157628"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=157628"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=157628"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}