{"id":146391,"date":"2022-12-07T18:55:02","date_gmt":"2022-12-08T02:55:02","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/?p=146391"},"modified":"2022-12-08T02:06:47","modified_gmt":"2022-12-08T10:06:47","slug":"the-barcelona-complex-lionel-messi-and-the-making-and-unmaking-of-the-worlds-greatest-soccer-club","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/?p=146391","title":{"rendered":"The Barcelona Complex: Lionel Messi and the Making&#8211;and Unmaking&#8211;of the World&#8217;s Greatest Soccer Club"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><A HREF=\"https:\/\/www.amazon.com\/gp\/product\/B08NY6KWC4\/ref=dbs_a_def_rwt_hsch_vapi_tkin_p1_i1\">Simon Kuper writes in this 2021 book<\/a>:<\/p>\n<p>* By 1970, they had developed a revolutionary new brand of football, one that would help shape the sport for the next fifty years, especially in the Netherlands and Barcelona. Ajax people didn\u2019t really have a name for the style, but foreigners called it \u201ctotal football.\u201d<br \/>\n \u201cTotal football\u201d meant that every player attacked and everyone defended. Ajax\u2019s players changed position so fluidly that it became hard even to speak about positions. Ajax\u2019s game evolved into what Cruyff called \u201ca controlled chaos.\u201d 26 Every player had to think for himself nonstop, adapting his position second by second depending on where every other player was. The ideal of a totally fluid football team went back to the \u201cDanubian Whirl\u201d of the 1930s\u2019 Austrian Wunderteam. Ajax had reinvented it for a new era. 27<br \/>\n The dominant style of the 1960s had been defensive Italian catenaccio . Ajax took the opposite approach: they played in the opponents\u2019 half, passing one-touch at top speed, with players changing positions all the time. They positioned themselves so the man on the ball always had at least two diagonal passes to choose from. A pass that goes straight ahead is easy for an opponent to read, while a square ball is usually pointless, and can be fatal if intercepted. But no single opposition player can block two diagonals simultaneously. So Ajax made triangles, prefiguring the great Barcelona teams of Cruyff himself and Pep Guardiola.<br \/>\n Cruyff saw football as geometry, a question of space. When Ajax had the ball, they made the pitch wide: he said wingers had to have \u201cchalk on their boots.\u201d When Ajax lost possession, they shrank space: several players would \u201cpress\u201d the opponent on the ball, aiming to win it back at once. That was the perfect moment, because a team that had just won the ball was usually disorganized, disorganized, with players out of position. If you could rob them, you could have a clear run on goal. And if your opponents never got a chance to build, they grew demoralized.<br \/>\n Pressing, or \u201chunting,\u201d as Ajax called it, required almost military coordination. Each player had to occupy exactly the right spot, and everyone had to join the press. Ajax\u2019s attackers were the first defenders. Conversely, the goalkeeper was the first attacker, starting moves with incisive passes. He played like a \u201cfly keeper\u201d in street football, patrolling his entire half as if he were a defender in gloves. This meant that Ajax used all eleven players, whereas other teams played with just ten.<br \/>\n \u201cNobody had overturned the codes of football like we did,\u201d 28 Cruyff said later. Arrigo Sacchi, coach of \u201cil Grande Milan\u201d of 1987\u20131990, would comment, \u201cThere has only been one real tactical revolution, and it happened when football shifted from an individual to a collective game. It happened with Ajax.\u201d 29<br \/>\n Cruyff marshaled the collective. He could pass in any direction because he was, in the phrase of his great biographer, Nico Scheepmaker, \u201cfour-footed\u201d: 30 he used the insides and outsides of both feet, curling the ball like a snooker player. He clocked at a glance which foot a defender had planted in the ground, and accelerated past him on that side. He always said that speed wasn\u2019t about running fast, but about knowing when to run\u2014a claim that denied his own astonishing acceleration.<br \/>\n On the field, Cruyff was everywhere. Ajax\u2019s trademark changes of position were in part an adaptation to his penchant for roaming. He was an extreme version of what we now call a \u201cfalse nine\u201d: a center-forward who constantly abandoned his position, dropping back into midfield or the wing or even central defense, losing his markers to find space and opportunity. He once explained, \u201cIf they don\u2019t follow me, I\u2019m free. If they follow me, they\u2019re one man short in defense.\u201d 31 Ajax\u2019s midfielders would burst into the space he vacated.<\/p>\n<p>* The great player used to live like a rock star. He was pursued by groupies. He expected his body to give out by the age of thirty. He didn\u2019t make a fortune. And so he lived large. After all, being a genius meant you didn\u2019t have to work hard. Ferenc Pusk\u00e1s in the 1950s was fat, George Best in the 1960s an alcoholic, Cruyff chain-smoked, and Maradona took cocaine. The temptations of stardom were magnificent; succumbing was almost the point.<br \/>\nBest after 1968, and Maradona and Pel\u00e9 for most of their club careers, played with many unremarkable teammates. Maradona at Napoli often received passes behind him (which he would kindly applaud). Both for his club and his country, he learned to play alone.<br \/>\n Few of these men aspired to weekly brilliance. Pel\u00e9 was forever crossing the planet to play lucrative exhibition games. Maradona turned it on for World Cups but rarely in between. And they all got kicked a lot. In 1966, Pel\u00e9 limped out of the World Cup. A few years later, before Cruyff joined Bar\u00e7a, Real Madrid\u2019s chairman Santiago Bernab\u00e9u warned that the Spanish league wouldn\u2019t suit the Dutchman, \u201cbecause they\u2019ll break those little legs of his within three weeks.\u201d 55 Watching clips of Cruyff playing for Barcelona, it\u2019s noticeable that almost every opponent chops or trips or elbows him, or slides in with a two-footed challenge, or at least tries to. In his first match against Granada, his teammates wouldn\u2019t let him enter the opposition\u2019s penalty area for a corner: \u201cYou don\u2019t go into the box against these guys.\u201d 56<br \/>\n In 1983, Maradona\u2019s spell with Barcelona effectively ended when his ankle was crushed by the defender Andoni Goikoetxea, the \u201cButcher of Bilbao.\u201d \u201cMaradona has not died,\u201d Goikoetxea pointed out in mitigation. Sometimes, intimidation took baroque psychological forms. A month before Goikoetxea\u2019s assault, Barcelona hosted Nottingham Forest in a preseason friendly. Forest\u2019s manager Brian Clough went up to Maradona in the tunnel before the game, announced, \u201cYou might be able to play a bit, but I can still grab you by the balls,\u201d and proceeded to do just that, recalled Clough\u2019s midfielder Steve Hodge. 57<br \/>\n What transformed the star\u2019s lot was TV. Before the 1990s, few matches were televised live. Then Rupert Murdoch and Silvio Berlu-sconi built TV channels on football. Suddenly clubs became content providers, and stars were premium content. The clubs offered the stars a new deal: we\u2019ll pay you fortunes if you\u2019ll live like professionals. Messi and Ronaldo accepted the offer.<br \/>\n Football\u2019s authorities protected stars by cracking down on fouls and banning the tackle from behind. Messi said in 2005, \u201cIn professional football nothing really happens because there are referees. At school was where kicks were real kicks.\u201d 58 Once he became recognized as an international treasure, from about 2008, he received extra protection. Even if a referee missed a foul, the culprit still had to worry about being caught on camera. Cruyff noted in retirement, \u201cTV improved the skill level. Now the good players are protected.\u201d 59 Imagine what Cruyff himself could have done with that protection.<br \/>\n Perfect, telegenic fields have helped, too. Messi didn\u2019t have to navigate the muddy Dutch fields of Cruyff\u2019s youth, when simply not falling over was sometimes a feat. And Messi was never going to destroy his knee on a frozen pitch on Boxing Day, as Brian Clough did as a brilliant forward in 1962.<br \/>\n In the TV era, the best players have congregated at a handful of the richest clubs. Messi has spent his entire club career playing with world-class teammates, who enabled him to reach his best.<\/p>\n<p>* Messi\u2019s need for a band became clear during all those tournaments struggling in front of mediocre midfielders and defenders with Argentina. He was unable to imagine the mindset of a player who couldn\u2019t see obvious one-twos or execute basic one-touch passes. At the World Cup 2010 I was transfixed by Newcastle United\u2019s ungainly winger, Jon\u00e1s Guti\u00e9rrez, who performed a comic impersonation of a right-back for Argentina while often struggling to stay upright. The next World Cup it was center-back Federico Fern\u00e1ndez, astute enough to know he had been promoted beyond his competence, so terrified of the ball that the moment he received it, he would try to shove it into the feet of the nearest teammate.<br \/>\n The manager of a leading national team explained to me the difference between the Messi of Bar\u00e7a and the Messi of Argentina. For his club, the manager said, Messi typically received the ball near the opposition\u2019s penalty area, after a series of short passes involving multiple players. He then had about five teammates within twenty meters of him, each one drawing away defenders. He could choose between multiple passes, or he could dribble. Often he was in a one-against-one situation, and as Mourinho said, \u201cWhen Messi has the ball one-on-one, you\u2019re dead. There\u2019s no way to solve that problem.\u201d 61<br \/>\n Argentina, by contrast, are a team without a system. They rarely manage to win the ball near the opposition\u2019s goal, and they give it to Messi when they can find him rather than when he asks for it. Often that\u2019s in midfield, with no teammates near him, as if plan A is for him to re-create Maradona\u2019s solo goal against England. Opponents closing in on him know something useful: he\u2019ll probably dribble.<br \/>\n Argentina have forced Messi to play like a pibe . At the 2014 World Cup, he completed forty-six dribbles, seventeen more than his nearest rival, Holland\u2019s Arjen Robben; meanwhile, Messi completed only 242 passes, two fewer than Germany\u2019s keeper, Manuel Neuer. But Messi didn\u2019t want to be a pibe anymore. Whereas Maradona was the individual who wanted to beat the system, Barcelona had socialized Messi into a Cruyffian collective game. With Argentina, his frustrations often spilled over into quarrels with teammates and referees. After the defender Nicol\u00e1s Burdisso was unable to get the ball to him during a match in 2011, he and Messi had to be separated in the changing room. 62 Cruyff in the 1970s had enjoyed playing for his national team because the standard was higher than at Bar\u00e7a; 63 for Messi it was the other way around.<br \/>\n Only at Barcelona did Messi find the ideal environment for greatness. One afternoon, a woman who lives in Castelldefels drove me past his home, and I realized: the essential underpinning of his routinely brilliant football was a boring life. High up in this unremarkable town, away from the beaches, he had bought the neighbor\u2019s house and constructed a compound complete with mini\u2013football field. Palm trees, bougainvillea, and white walls provided privacy. He lived here for years without security cameras or alarms until eventually the club installed some. He later learned to make himself unpredictable to criminals by driving different routes to training in different cars. 64 But even with these precautions, his tranquil home life couldn\u2019t have been further from the overheated chaos of Argentina.<\/p>\n<p>* &#8230;let\u2019s pause for a moment and think of what Messi does for global happiness. To paraphrase Cruyff\u2019s biographer, Scheepmaker, he has made our lives richer than they would have been without him. We live in the age of Messi, and it often feels like the best way to spend this time is to watch him. A friend who has struggled with his mental health told me that for years he tried to catch almost every match Messi played for Barcelona: \u201cFor me, watching him has something of a therapeutic quality. He\u2019s basically an accessible genius, on a weekly basis at a relatively low cost of a yearly subscription.\u201d<br \/>\n Messi can even have that effect on opponents during a game. The French striker Djibril Ciss\u00e9 recalled, \u201cI was surprised to find myself watching him, leaving the match and becoming a spectator.\u201d 85<br \/>\n Messi is extraordinary even when playing for his country. If the Messi of Argentina sometimes seems disappointing, that\u2019s because we compare him with the Messi of Bar\u00e7a and with the Maradona of the World Cup 1986. In fact, according to the sports statistician Benjamin Morris, the Barcelona Messi and the Argentina Messi have been probably \u201cthe two best players in the world.\u201d 86 Remember that between 2007 and 2016, Messi reached four finals with Argentina, three in the Copa Am\u00e9rica and the World Cup final of 2014. He lost them all, but three of them only by the finest of margins.<\/p>\n<p>* Sociability is part of the point of Bar\u00e7a\u2019s football, Seirul\u00b7lo told me. \u201cThat\u2019s why we pass the ball a lot,\u201d he said, \u201cso that all the players are involved.\u201d Eamon Dunphy, in Only a Game? in 1976, put it even higher:<br \/>\n If you are just knocking a ball between you, on a training ground, a relationship develops between you. It\u2019s a form of expression\u2014you are communicating as much as if you are making love to somebody. If you take two players who work together in midfield, say, they will know each other through football as intimately as two lovers. That would apply to Giles and Bremner, for example. It\u2019s a very close relationship you build up when you are resolving problems together, trying to create situations together. It\u2019s an unspoken relationship, but your movements speak, your game speaks. The kind of ball you give each other, the kind of passes you give each other, the kind of situations you set up together, speak for you. You don\u2019t necessarily become closer in a social sense, but you develop a close unspoken understanding.<\/p>\n<p>* Great soloists were what distinguished Barcelona from the Spanish national team of their era. Spain passed like Barcelona, pressed like Barcelona, and built walls like Barcelona, but they didn\u2019t score like Barcelona, because they didn\u2019t have the soloists. They won the World Cup in 2010 by scoring just eight goals and conceding two in seven games.<\/p>\n<p>* A coach has to seduce players into accepting his ideas. Whereas motivating players is a top-down relationship, seduction implies a relationship of equals. The contemporary manager is more film director than military general. Authoritarian rule has faded out even faster in football than in most high-skill workplaces.<\/p>\n<p>* Lilian Thuram: &#8220;I\u2019ve never met a racist person in football. Maybe they were, but I didn\u2019t see it. You know why? Because people who are racist tend not to know the Other. In football, we share things. And in football it\u2019s harder to have discrimination, because we are judged on very specific performances.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>* [Luis] Van Gaal left at the end of that season after multiple conflicts with his Brazilian players, and no prizes. He had learned what happens in modern football when the talent clashes with the club: the talent wins.<br \/>\n Many fans find this incomprehensible. They still expect a manager to command his players like the no-nonsense headmaster of a 1950s reform school for bad boys. In fact, a macho coach who tries to break the players\u2019 will, or who attempts heavy-handed \u201cmotivation,\u201d will prompt talent flight. Modern clubs have abandoned the fantasy of dominating their mobile, multinational, multimillionaire, near-irreplaceable players, most of them armed with egos, agents, and journalistic sycophants. In a talent-driven business, rule by talent is inevitable.<\/p>\n<p>* Money is the best measure of player power in football. Big clubs spend about 50 to 70 percent of their revenues on footballers\u2019 salaries, and another 20 to 40 percent on transfer fees, calculates Ian Graham of Liverpool. In other words, the talent is able to command up to 90 percent of clubs\u2019 revenues.<\/p>\n<p>* But the truth is that sport isn\u2019t a very useful model for business. On the contrary: many sports clubs are so badly run that they ought to model themselves on ordinary companies. (The only sphere of excellence inside many clubs is the playing squad.)<br \/>\n More fundamentally, though, a football club is a different kind of animal than a bank, a law firm, or a multinational oil business. The biggest difference is the importance of talent.<\/p>\n<p>* Wenger, who went from running Arsenal to giving management talks at corporate conferences, admitted that lessons from sport weren\u2019t easily transferable: \u201cPlayers have to be as close as possible to 100 percent of their potential to be efficient\u2014what is not the case in daily life.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>* At Bar\u00e7a\u2014and in Spanish life more generally\u2014there are high expectations of courtesy. Public tellings-off are not tolerated. This indirectness can be a problem. It helps explain (along with the family nature of Bar\u00e7a) why nobody ever took Busquets or Piqu\u00e9 aside to tell them they had got old and it was time to go.<br \/>\n \u201cIt\u2019s part of top-level sport that you say things, and discuss things,\u201d said Zenden. But in Spain, \u201cif you have an open clash with a player, it won\u2019t automatically come good again.\u201d Any criticism needs to be delivered in private and carefully phrased. A shrewd coach will first invest time building a relationship of trust with a player before trying to broach sensitive issues.<\/p>\n<p>* Inside a football team, pay is the main measure of status. Cruyff said, \u201cThe degree of appreciation is expressed in money. So it\u2019s not about the sum that you earn, but the hierarchical position that you occupy.\u201d 23 Piqu\u00e9 was signaling, in the grossest possible way, that his status was stratospheres above that of the people who abuse him.<br \/>\n Since money in football equals status, players keep trying to gouge more of it from their club, no matter how much they already have.<\/p>\n<p>* High-intensity running\u2014defined as moving at over fifteen kilometers an hour\u2014increased 30 percent in the English Premier League between 2006 and 2013, according to the Gatorade Sport Science Institute. The number of sprints rose sharply in the Champions League, too. \u201cWe have to have a much better physical condition to play our game,\u201d Paco Seirul\u00b7lo told me.<br \/>\n Modern coaches push players almost every day for eleven months of the year, leaving little time for recovery. Most players can perform optimally in the autumn, but struggle to maintain that level between February and May\u2014the period that Bar\u00e7a defines as \u201chigh competition,\u201d with lots of matches, travel, and sleep loss.<br \/>\n Gil Rodas, a specialist in sports medicine at the University of Barcelona who has worked with Bar\u00e7a for many years, said the game\u2019s rising \u201cintensity and density\u201d had prompted an increase in muscle and tendon injuries, which he called \u201cthe cancer\u201d of football. The packed schedule didn\u2019t help: one study found \u201ca 6.2-fold higher injury rate in players who played two matches per week compared with those who played only one.\u201d 10 As players\u2019 pay rose, so did the cost of injury: on a salary of \u20ac8 million, spread across forty club games, each match appearance was worth \u20ac200,000.<br \/>\n In short, footballers needed to get fitter. How best to achieve that? An unspoken truth in the game is that doping will do more for you than broccoli. I\u2019m sure there are some illegal drugs in football. On the other hand, clubs, doctors, and players have strong incentives not to risk getting caught.<\/p>\n<p>* Here are some of Bar\u00e7a\u2019s recommendations:<br \/>\n \u2022  Cheeringly, caffeine appears to improve everything in football from cognition through sprinting to passing accuracy. Bar\u00e7a\u2019s booklet recommends tea or coffee at pre-training breakfast, and caffeinated sports drinks (or gum) on match days, ideally to be taken during the warm-up. 13<br \/>\n \u2022  Carbs are an essential part of the pre-match meal, usually eaten about three hours before kickoff. Most clubs also provide them at halftime, often in the form of a gel or a drink.<\/p>\n<p>* Within an hour of a match ending, players should ingest protein to help their damaged muscle fibers recover. (The player\u2019s cycle is \u201cdamage\/recovery, damage\/recovery,\u201d said Liz\u00e1rraga.) The anti-inflammatory protein recovery shake\u2014which some clubs personalize for each player\u2014has become a ritual in the industry after training and matches.<\/p>\n<p>* For all the effort invested in getting footballers to eat right, there is still little scientific evidence that it makes a difference. We just don\u2019t know whether good nutrition wins football matches or does much to prevent injury.<\/p>\n<p>* Decision-making and football intelligence\u2014pattern recognition, in effect\u2014seemed to improve with age, he explained. \u201cThe percentage of successful passes is 3\u20135 percent higher in players over 30 compared to players between 16 and 29 years old.\u201d That could compensate for a decline in speed. Lago Pe\u00f1as cited a study of players in Germany\u2019s Bundesliga: after age thirty, their number of sprints (defined as runs faster than 6.3 meters per second, maintained for at least a second) was 21 percent lower than for younger players.<\/p>\n<p>* Active footballers may not be any happier than the rest of us, but they do have more intensity. The basic illusion of top-class sport is that it is more important than life and death. Winning in front of a hundred thousand fans provides a buzz unmatched in ordinary life. So, perversely, does losing. You sit in the changing room with all your teammates, your body hurting, too tired to lift a bottle of water to your lips, slumped in misery, and it is a shared intensity of emotion that you will never experience again after football. Retirement in one\u2019s thirties is a widespread fantasy among Dilberts in office cubicles, but most top-class athletes have too much internal motivation to spend their remaining decades on the sun lounger.<br \/>\n They struggle to understand how the rest of us put up with our low-adrenaline lives.<\/p>\n<p>* But deprived of Bar\u00e7a, [Neymar] lost some of his discipline. At times he degenerated into a number ten who liked to receive the ball standing still, then taunt opponents by doing tricks while they kicked him. It was his natural game, and perhaps he preferred it to brilliant servitude at Bar\u00e7a. Stuck in the French league, the most gifted player of his generation effectively retired from weekly top-class football.<\/p>\n<p>* Only outside Western Europe does youth football remain pre-Cruyffian. Around 2013, a kids\u2019 indoor soccer tournament in Rockville Centre, New York, found itself a referee short. One of the organizers asked the parents: Does anyone know the rules well enough to call a game? A Hispanic-looking man in a baseball cap volunteered.<br \/>\n But he turned out to interpret his role rather broadly. He kept stopping the game to advise both teams on positioning. The watching parents, who had come to see their kids win, grew antsy. \u201cCome on! Let them play!\u201d they shouted.<br \/>\n The guy in the baseball cap, on sabbatical in New York after four draining seasons at Bar\u00e7a, was Pep Guardiola.<\/p>\n<p>* In Catalonia today, people stomp out of Sunday family lunch or break up with old friends because of quarrels about independence. Catalonia has become an even more distrustful place than the rest of Spain, which is itself low-trust by European standards. In the World Values Survey for 2010 to 2014, only 14 percent of people in Catalonia strongly agreed that \u201cmost people can be trusted\u201d\u2014less than half the level of Madrid.<\/p>\n<p>* Messi (and for the most part, Luis Su\u00e1rez) stopped defending\u2014an almost unheard-of privilege in top-class football. When Bar\u00e7a lost the ball, opponents aimed to play the ball out through Messi\u2019s zone, while he just stood there and watched them go. Then he would often trudge back alone, yards offside behind the opposition\u2019s defenders, watching play unfold at the far end of the field. Teammates like Rakiti\u0107, Arturo Vidal, Sergi Roberto, and Griezmann acted as his legs, pulling forty-yard sprints to cover the holes he left. That dragged Bar\u00e7a\u2019s midfield out of shape.<br \/>\n As the team aged with Messi, Bar\u00e7a\u2019s training sessions slowed down. This was a shock for Griezmann, who had come from Atl\u00e9tico Madrid. There, he recalled, \u201cEvery training session was at the intensity level of a match.\u201d 6 To the quiet dismay of Bar\u00e7a\u2019s younger players, football\u2019s most demanding rondo descended into a warm-up routine. In matches, Barcelona\u2019s defenders and midfielders rarely overlapped anymore.<\/p>\n<p>* \u201cEvery day football gets more spectacular, the players physically, technically, and tactically stronger,\u201d remarked Gerard Piqu\u00e9. \u201cI always say that the best defenders in history are those of today.\u201d Even Franz Beckenbauer, he added, was \u201cworse on the ball, slower and understood the game less well\u201d than Piqu\u00e9\u2019s generation. As for defenders who just kicked people, they had died out. 7<br \/>\n Piqu\u00e9 was right that football kept improving\u2014but most of all outside Barcelona. While Bar\u00e7a neglected pressing, other teams updated it. Gegenpressing , the Germans called the latest version: chasing up the opposition the moment you lose possession, so as to win the ball near their goal, before their defense could organize. It was Ajax\u2019s \u201chunting\u201d of the 1970s on fast-forward\u2014a game so rapid it should be called \u201cstorming.\u201d<br \/>\n Storming teams adopted some of Bar\u00e7a\u2019s innovations, such as Guardiola\u2019s five-second pressing rule, but discarded others, like the obsession with possession. Whereas Guardiola\u2019s Bar\u00e7a had hated losing the ball, for teams like Klopp\u2019s Liverpool, losing the ball and then winning it back was the strategy.<br \/>\n In 2014, Germany\u2019s 1\u20137 thrashing of Brazil with rapid forward pressing had seemed like a hilarious one-off. It turned out to be the portent of a new phenomenon: blowout wins by teams playing at a pace that would have seemed impossible as recently as 2010. By 2020, storming had become the orthodoxy, practiced even by traditionally cautious teams like Juventus and Chelsea. 8 Wing-backs pelted forward nonstop. Midfielders pulled sprints when their team won the ball, and also when they lost it.<br \/>\n Wenger told me in 2020:<br \/>\n In the last ten, fifteen years we have gone for real athletes, and from the day on where everybody could measure the physical performance, all the players who could not perform physically well were kicked out of the game. Today football goes at two hundred miles an hour, so you have to show first that you can go on the train. Once you\u2019re on the train you can express your talent, but if you cannot get on the train, you don\u2019t play.<br \/>\n A football field is about seven thousand square meters in size. Teams like Bayern and Liverpool, said Wenger, squeezed their defending into 8 percent of that space: they massed players around the ball in a zone of about six hundred square meters in the opposition\u2019s half. Storming had become so overwhelming that a brilliant lightweight like Mesut \u00d6zil was squeezed out of the Premier League at Arsenal.<br \/>\n \u201cIt has killed some artists,\u201d said Wenger. \u201cI think it has uniformized a little bit too much the way to play football. . . . Everybody presses on the first ball from the keeper. . . . It has emphasized the chain defending to close balls down. And it has killed a little bit the creativity.\u201d<br \/>\n Yet storming produced lots of goals. After a team went ahead, rather than sitting on their lead they just kept on storming.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Simon Kuper writes in this 2021 book: * By 1970, they had developed a revolutionary new brand of football, one that would help shape the sport for the next fifty years, especially in the Netherlands and Barcelona. Ajax people didn\u2019t &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/?p=146391\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[29731,29685],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-146391","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-soccer","category-spain"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/146391","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=146391"}],"version-history":[{"count":20,"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/146391\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":146440,"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/146391\/revisions\/146440"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=146391"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=146391"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=146391"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}