{"id":145589,"date":"2022-10-12T16:18:49","date_gmt":"2022-10-13T00:18:49","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/?p=145589"},"modified":"2022-10-28T15:06:09","modified_gmt":"2022-10-28T23:06:09","slug":"american-universities-began-asking-for-a-personal-statement-essay-to-weed-out-jews","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/?p=145589","title":{"rendered":"American Universities Began Asking For A Personal Statement Essay To Weed Out Jews"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>College admissions in America operate with the tools of the last century that were enacted to limit the admission of Jews. In most countries, admission to university is done on the basis of test scores, but American universities in the 20th Century moved away from that objective standard to subjective standards that allowed them to reduce their intake of Jews without overtly stating they didn&#8217;t want Jews. <\/p>\n<p>To increase their intake flexibility, American colleges added requirements for demographic information, personal essays, and extracurricular activities. Why? So they could exclude Jews and anyone else they didn&#8217;t want on the public basis that the university was looking for gentlemen rather than drones. What constitutes a Harvard man? This is subjective, ergo, Harvard gets to choose who it admits. <\/p>\n<p>Universities assumed that Jews would fall short of their moral character standards, but <A HREF=\"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/?p=139670\">moral character is a fiction<\/a>. We don&#8217;t have a moral character. We have moral characters in different situations. Our traits are domain-specific. We may be honest in our marriage but not at work. We may be nice to strangers but vicious to our family. Who we are depends upon the situations we find ourselves in. The situation is frequently more determinative of how we behave than any supposedly innate character traits. Nobody is always brave. Some people are brave in certain circumstances and other people are brave in different circumstances. The person who is a hero on the football field Friday night may well be a docile lamb Sunday morning in church with his mom and then a rapist at a party that night with a stranger and then a life-saver when he stops on his drive home and rescues someone from a burning car. <\/p>\n<p>America&#8217;s elite universities today use subjective admission criteria to limit their intake of Whites. Without these subjective standards, there would be <A HREF=\"https:\/\/1gyhoq479ufd3yna29x7ubjn-wpengine.netdna-ssl.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/CEW-SAT-only-Admission.pdf\">more Whites on the best campuses and fewer of every other ethnic group<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>Professor Merve Emre, the author of the following essay, is a Turkish-American professor at the Oxford Centre for Life Writing. <\/p>\n<p>Though I was born to blog, to quote journalist Rob Eshman, I&#8217;ve never been much good at writing essays. My friend <A HREF=\"https:\/\/www.lukeford.net\/profiles\/profiles\/dave_deutsch.htm\">Dave Deutsch<\/a> compared me to a porn star who can&#8217;t give a hand job.<\/p>\n<p>I don&#8217;t believe the individual is a fiction, but we are primarily the product of time, place and heritage. I wouldn&#8217;t be who I am right now if I weren&#8217;t writing these words in anticipation of you reading them. I wouldn&#8217;t be saying these words alone to a wall. I don&#8217;t exist as I am without you. Without you, I am not me. <\/p>\n<p>I am a historicist. I believe everything and everyone has to be understood in their time and place. I don&#8217;t see the world as the classical liberal does &#8212; a collection of individuals with inalienable rights. Rather, I see the world composed of nations. I don&#8217;t see individuals primarily as individuals but primarily as members of nations and whatever rights those nations can afford will be circumscribed by circumstances. <\/p>\n<p>Most people who talk about themselves publicly are boring because most people don&#8217;t see themselves accurately. The winning formula for first-person writing, then, is to keep the focus on what fills you with shame. We all prefers to read about others&#8217; troubles rather than their triumphs. <\/p>\n<p><iframe width=\"560\" height=\"315\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/vXDJ_ZR6Bsw\" title=\"YouTube video player\" frameborder=\"0\" allow=\"accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture\" allowfullscreen><\/iframe><\/p>\n<p><A HREF=\"https:\/\/www.nybooks.com\/articles\/2022\/11\/03\/the-illusion-of-the-first-person-merve-emre\/\">Merve Emre writes in the New York Review of Books<\/a>:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>\nA more specific genealogy for the genre\u2014and an explanation of its distinctively American quality today\u2014is the \u201cpersonal statement\u201d that high school students applying to US colleges and universities were asked to produce starting around 1920, and which has evolved into a cornerstone of the admissions process. Although it is difficult to pinpoint how many students per year write personal statements, more than 5.6 million applications were submitted in 2019\u20132020 through the Common App, a generic college admission application that requires the applicant to write at least one personal essay. Orbiting these millions of essays is a burgeoning industry of tutoring, prepping, and editing services, evinced by the popularity of books such as How to Write the Perfect Personal Statement, The Berkeley Book of College Essays, College Essays That Made a Difference, and How to Write a Winning Personal Statement. The personal narrative is the designated genre to reveal the writer\u2019s \u201cinner self,\u201d an \u201copportunity to differentiate yourself from everyone else,\u201d writes Alan Gelb in Conquering the College Admissions Essay in 10 Steps.<\/p>\n<p>The first mention of the personal essay as an admissions requirement, according to Jerome Karabel\u2019s The Chosen: The Hidden History of Admission Exclusion at Harvard, Yale, and Princeton (2005), came during Harvard\u2019s drastic changes to its admissions practices in the 1920s. Since the turn of the century, selection based on exam scores had created what administrators called a \u201cJewish problem\u201d: the admission of more Jewish applicants than the university deemed acceptable. \u201cWe can reduce the number of Jews by talking about other qualifications than those of admission examination,\u201d wrote Harvard president Abbott Lawrence Lowell in 1922, advocating for a subjective set of criteria. The other qualifications he listed, \u201ccharacter\u201d and \u201cleadership,\u201d were to be assessed through three new genres, as Karabel writes: \u201cDemographic information, a personal essay, and a detailed description of extracurricular activities.\u201d The assumption was that Jewish applicants would fall short of the school\u2019s desired \u201ccharacter standard\u201d\u2014that their \u201ccenturies of oppression and degradation\u201d meant that they were characterized not by a commitment to individual and personal self-assertion but by a \u201cmartyr air.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>To weed out Jewish applicants, universities mobilized the essay as an heir to the Catholic tradition of confession and the later Protestant tradition of narratives of \u201csaving faith,\u201d notes the historian Charles Petersen in his dissertation on meritocracy. No doubt the version of individualism championed by administrators drew on the moral culture of the Protestant bourgeoisie, what Max Weber described as its use of education to cultivate a rational, self-assertive personality. This type was marked by its ability to adhere to a consistent and subjective set of values in a disenchanted world. Forced to conceive the meaning of things, and even man\u2019s relationship to reality, as an individual matter, Weber\u2019s rational personality type formed intellectual arrangements to anoint himself the master and the arbiter of his own destiny, and eventually the destinies of those around him.<\/p>\n<p>The premise of elite college admissions was that this relation could be cinched, and indeed enhanced, by reversing its terms: that the ability to demonstrate, through the genre of the essay, one\u2019s commitment to an idealized model of private and rational individualism marked the applicant as someone well-suited to higher education. Whereas in previous centuries, higher education would have secured a career in the ministry, now it led to executive roles in industry and government. Beyond its discriminatory function, the personal essay sought to identify the students whom the university could transform into the political and economic leaders of the future. Learning how to \u201cgame the system\u201d was only a sign of the system\u2019s success at shaping applicants\u2019 behavior.<\/p>\n<p>The overtly discriminatory origins of the admissions essay have been superseded by more covert models of calibrating personhood by ethnicity, as in the recent case of Harvard University admissions officers accused of assigning Asian American applicants lower scores in subjective categories such as \u201cpositive personality.\u201d Yet the value the admissions essay\u2014and the college application process in general\u2014places on the private individual as a self-reflective and self-governing subject, the rightful heir to the spoils of capitalism, remains as powerful as ever. Kathryn Murphy and Thomas Karshan, in On Essays: Montaigne to the Present (2020), write:<\/p>\n<p>Applicants are encouraged to draw a moral out of a personal anecdote, often about struggle, and enriched by some element of their reading or studies: \u201cfailure,\u201d an expert on the admissions essay tells us, \u201cis essayistic gold.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Far from signaling weakness, the proud narration of failure speaks of character in precisely the terms set by the educated bourgeoisie of the early twentieth century: character as the capacity to maintain one\u2019s self-comportment in a moment of distress, to tell a tale of hardship lit by the glow of self-knowledge.<\/p>\n<p>At the start of the last century what Petersen has described as the \u201cCatholic tradition of confession,\u201d with its ponderous moral and spiritual accent, its desire for masochistic public exposure and redemption, had yet to enter the scene of personal essay writing and did not do so until the mid-1960s. Almost all the guides mentioned earlier warn applicants away from striking a tone that is too testimonial or therapeutic, working hard to buffer the admissions essay from the sins and perils of what is commonly called confessional writing. Unlike the admissions essay, whose rules and stakes are firmly pegged to educational institutions, confessional writing speaks to a shift in the importance of the individual and the technologies used to conceptualize new notions of personhood. \u201cIts development coincides with new cold war cultures of privacy and surveillance, with therapy\/pop psychology culture, with the falling away of modernist and \u2018New Critical\u2019 approaches to art and literature, with the rise of the television talk show and the cult of the celebrity,\u201d writes Jo Gill in Modern Confessional Writing (2006).<\/p><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>College admissions in America operate with the tools of the last century that were enacted to limit the admission of Jews. In most countries, admission to university is done on the basis of test scores, but American universities in the &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/?p=145589\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"om_disable_all_campaigns":false,"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[16281,29],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-145589","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-college","category-jews"],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/145589","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=145589"}],"version-history":[{"count":23,"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/145589\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":145932,"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/145589\/revisions\/145932"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=145589"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=145589"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=145589"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}