{"id":120228,"date":"2018-01-31T12:37:35","date_gmt":"2018-01-31T20:37:35","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/?p=120228"},"modified":"2018-01-31T12:44:53","modified_gmt":"2018-01-31T20:44:53","slug":"david-brooks-the-ugly-face-of-anti-gentilism","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/?p=120228","title":{"rendered":"David Brooks &#8211; The Ugly Face Of Anti-Gentilism"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><A HREF=\"http:\/\/takimag.com\/article\/david_brooks_demands_new_improved_americans_20_steve_sailer\/print#axzz55mSIIwV6\">Steve Sailer writes<\/a>: <\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>As I <a href=\"http:\/\/takimag.com\/article\/immigration_and_the_deep_state_steve_sailer%22%20%5Cl%20%22axzz55frHa7A2\" target=\"_blank\">predicted<\/a> in my two <a href=\"http:\/\/takimag.com\/article\/democratic_trump_steve_sailer#axzz55lzWaoUv\" target=\"_blank\">previous<\/a> <em>Taki\u2019s<\/em> columns, the Trump administration offered to Democrats an extremely <a href=\"http:\/\/www.unz.com\/isteve\/trump-the-moderate\/\" target=\"_blank\">moderate<\/a> and generous compromise immigration package. Trump proposed a path to citizenship for 1.8 million illegal aliens in return for three sensible reforms of the immigration system: a wall, an end to chain migration (or, as it should more accurately be called, clan migration), and the elimination of Teddy Kennedy\u2019s nitwit diversity lottery.<\/p>\n<p>In response, the respectable have, predictably, gone nuts spewing racist hate. For instance, House minority leader Nancy Pelosi asserted that Trump\u2019s compromise framework was part of his sinister plan to \u201c<a href=\"https:\/\/www.unz.com\/isteve\/pelosi-trumps-unmistakable-campaign-to-make-america-white-again\/\" target=\"_blank\">make America white again<\/a>.\u201d Likewise, Jennifer Rubin of <em>The Washington Post<\/em> explained \u201c<a href=\"https:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/blogs\/right-turn\/wp\/2018\/01\/26\/how-to-fight-trumps-plan-to-whiten-our-immigration-system\/?utm_term=.6f5aa96dad6c\" target=\"_blank\">How to fight Trump\u2019s plan to whiten our immigration system<\/a>.\u201d The new conventional wisdom is that it would be racist for the American people to have any say in how much immigration they must endure.<\/p>\n<p>David Brooks of <em>The New York Times<\/em> at least offers an <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2018\/01\/29\/opinion\/east-germany-immigration-usa.html\" target=\"_blank\">argument<\/a> for why he supports ethnic swamping besides just the usual \u201cWhite Americans, I hate you\u201d:<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>Every few years I try to write a column staking out a reasonable middle ground on immigration&#8230;. The case for restricting immigration seems superficially plausible.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>For example, there are 7 billion non-Americans in the world. So if America didn\u2019t restrict immigration, over <a href=\"http:\/\/www.unz.com\/isteve\/gallup-138-million-foreign-adults-want\/\" target=\"_blank\">one hundred million<\/a> immigrants would quickly pour into our country. They\u2019d keep coming until life in America became about as cruddy as in their home countries.<\/p>\n<p>But that doesn\u2019t occur to Brooks. Much as he tries, David just can\u2019t find <em>any<\/em> good reason to restrict immigration:<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>And every few years I fail. That\u2019s because when you wade into the evidence you find that the case for restricting immigration is pathetically weak.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>As proof, David recommends you drive through economically depressed parts of America:<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>If you start in rural New England and drive down into Appalachia or across into the Upper Midwest you will be driving through county after county with few immigrants. These rural places are often 95 percent white&#8230;. They are often marked by economic stagnation, social isolation, family breakdown and high opioid addiction.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p><A HREF=\"http:\/\/www.unz.com\/isteve\/david-brooks-on-why-you-american-1-0s-are-outmoded-compared-to-american-2-0-immigrants\/\">Comments at Steve Sailer<\/a>:<\/p>\n<p>* How many pundits have made this same argument as Brooks? I know William Kristol has. It betrays a shocking lack of empathy for the less fortunate, but only if they are white. Do they write about the impact of low-skilled immigrants on black wages and unemployment?<\/p>\n<p>Let\u2019s face it: what we see here is the lingering anti-Gentilism of a few highly-influential Ashkenazi Americans, which is deeply rooted in ancestral memories (false memories when it comes to Anglo-Protestant Americans) of anti-Semitism in the Old-World.<\/p>\n<p>The fact that their upper-middle-class children and grandchildren are not threatened by \u2014 indeed benefit very handsomely from \u2014 free mobility of labor and capital in an economically lopsided world, needs to also be taken into account. Or do they imagine themselves immune from ordinary human self-interest as well as suppressed feelings of resentment and a schadenfreudish spirit of revenge?<\/p>\n<p>One last question: will attitudes change when they realize that anti-Semitism is rife in these new immigrant groups, Hispanic and Asian alike, whose demographic explosion may undermine American popular support for the state of Israel? Probably not, but other, wiser and more prudent of their co-ethnics may rise in their stead, of which Stephen Miller is a harbinger. Let us hope this is true.<\/p>\n<p>* Also daily reminder that the man who says \u2018ethnostates don\u2019t work\u2019 has a son who served in the Israeli army and exactly zero serving in the highly diverse US army who seem to do the lions share of the fighting in the wars he endlessly proposes.<\/p>\n<p>* Interestingly, a lot of his commenters \u2014 who aren\u2019t exactly iSteve types \u2014 immediately noticed that Brooks\u2019 column can be read as an unstated but implied attack on black Americans.<\/p>\n<p>* When Brooks started comparing immigrants to native-born Americans, my iSteve training immediately led me to ask the question (unaddressed by Brooks, naturally): \u201cWhat\u2019s hidden in that general population term \u2018native Americans\u2019?\u201d<\/p>\n<p>The answer, which John Derbyshire has shown in other contexts (notably America\u2019s international ranking in student test scores) is that when you disaggregate the general set of natives into particular racial\/ethnic groups, you see a very different picture. Brooks certainly knows this; he\u2019s not a stupid writer, nor ignorant of the arguments advanced by Steve and Derb, among others.<\/p>\n<p>One rationale for his having written such an idiotic column is that Brooks is indeed making a coded (and therefore cowardly) disavowal of American blacks, the way Charles Murray\u2019s recent book (which he pointedly sites) was a veiled critique of black social dysfunction (with its implication that if disorder is this bad among lower class whites, imagine how much worse it must be among blacks).<\/p>\n<p>On the other hand, that\u2019s probably too generous an assessment of the column. The truth is, in the circle he now frequents, any realist subtext will go unnoticed, the PC pretext will be applauded, and it\u2019s just another payday for Brooks. He can rest in the certainty that he\u2019ll never, ever be asked to justify himself in public on these matters.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Steve Sailer writes: As I predicted in my two previous Taki\u2019s columns, the Trump administration offered to Democrats an extremely moderate and generous compromise immigration package. Trump proposed a path to citizenship for 1.8 million illegal aliens in return for &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/?p=120228\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[258,29724,29],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-120228","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-california","category-david-brooks","category-jews"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/120228","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=120228"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/120228\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":120233,"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/120228\/revisions\/120233"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=120228"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=120228"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=120228"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}