Dennis Prager said that this week.<\/p>\n
Charles Krauthammer writes in the Washington Post<\/a>:<\/p>\n About the only thing more comical than Barack Obama’s Nobel Peace Prize was the reaction of those who deemed the award "premature," as if the brilliance of Obama’s foreign policy is so self-evident and its success so assured that if only the Norway Five had waited a few years, his Nobel worthiness would have been universally acknowledged.<\/p>\n To believe this, you have to be a dreamy adolescent (preferably Scandinavian and a member of the Socialist International) or an indiscriminate imbiber of White House talking points. After all, this was precisely the spin on the president’s various apology tours through Europe and the Middle East: National self-denigration — excuse me, outreach and understanding — is not meant to yield immediate results; it simply plants the seeds of good feeling from which foreign policy successes shall come.<\/p>\n Chauncey Gardiner could not have said it better. Well, at nine months, let’s review.<\/p>\n What’s come from Obama holding his tongue while Iranian demonstrators were being shot and from his recognizing the legitimacy of a thug regime illegitimately returned to power in a fraudulent election? Iran cracks down even more mercilessly on the opposition and races ahead with its nuclear program.<\/p>\n What’s come from Secretary of State Hillary Clinton taking human rights off the table on a visit to China and from Obama’s shameful refusal to see the Dalai Lama (a postponement, we are told)? China hasn’t moved an inch on North Korea, Iran or human rights. Indeed, it’s pushing with Russia to dethrone the dollar as the world’s reserve currency.<\/p>\n What’s come from the new-respect-for-Muslims Cairo speech and the unprecedented pressure on Israel for a total settlement freeze? "The settlement push backfired," reports<\/a> The Post, and Arab-Israeli peace prospects have "arguably regressed."<\/p>\n And what’s come from Obama’s single most dramatic foreign policy stroke — the sudden abrogation of missile defense arrangements with Poland and the Czech Republic that Russia had virulently opposed? For the East Europeans it was a crushing blow, a gratuitous restoration of Russian influence over a region that thought it had regained independence under American protection.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Dennis Prager said that this week. Charles Krauthammer writes in the Washington Post: About the only thing more comical than Barack Obama’s Nobel Peace Prize was the reaction of those who deemed the award "premature," as if the brilliance of … Continue reading \n