It sounds bad, but separating groups is sometimes the best way of maintaining peace. By contrasting, living in many types of diversity tends to reduce trust and increase tension.<\/p>\n
J.J. Goldberg writes<\/a>: <\/p>\n \nA Major Jewish Philanthropist Just Published A Plan To Ethnically Cleanse Palestinians<\/p>\n far-right faction within Israel\u2019s Likud-led governing coalition has endorsed a plan for Israel to annex the entire West Bank and encourage the Palestinian residents to immigrate to neighboring Arab countries. The plan would allow Palestinians who voluntarily gave up all \u201cnational aspirations\u201d to remain, granting them limited municipal self-government, but without Israeli citizenship or Knesset voting rights.<\/p>\n Make no mistake about this \u2014 this plan amounts to a none-too-subtle form of ethnic cleansing. It presents Palestinians with an untenable choice: Leave your home or be stripped of basic civil rights, perhaps forever.<\/p>\n Despite (or because of) its draconian nature, the plan was adopted unanimously at a September 12 convention of the National Union-Tekuma party, which holds two Knesset seats as the junior partner in the religious-nationalist Jewish Home bloc. National Union leader Uri Ariel serves as minister of agriculture in Benjamin Netanyahu\u2019s Cabinet. The party\u2019s other Knesset member, Bezalel Smotrich, is the author of the annexation plan.<\/p>\n It\u2019s a marginal enough party that those concerned with human rights or with Israel\u2019s international standing needn\u2019t fear the plan\u2019s immediate implementation. But we should be troubled by the plan\u2019s institutional backing \u2014 not just in Benjamin Netanyahu\u2019s government, but also in the heart of American Jewish philanthropy.<\/p>\n Smotrich\u2019s plan was released September 6 in an 8,600-word lead essay, \u201cThe Decision Plan\u201d (Tochnit Ha-Hachra\u2019ah), in the fall issue of the Hebrew-language bimonthly Hashiloach, a conservative journal of ideas published by the New York-based Tikvah Fund.<\/p>\n That\u2019s right \u2014 this plan\u2019s institutional backing includes one of the most distinguished philanthropies in Diaspora Jewry. Tikvah is one of several conservative foundations endowed by the estate of the late investment fund manager Zalman-Sanford Bernstein. It is largely controlled by his widow, the philanthropist Elaine Mem Bernstein, and Tikvah\u2019s board of directors includes some of the most prominent names in Jewish neoconservatism, among them William Kristol and Elliott Abrams.<\/p>\n In addition to Hashiloach, launched a year ago, Tikvah has a number of other publications, including the English-language journals Mosaic, Jewish Review of Books and the Library of Jewish Ideas, a book series published jointly with Princeton University Press. Another Bernstein foundation, Keren Keshet-The Rainbow Fund, publishes Nextbook and Tablet magazine. A third, the Avi Chai Foundation, is a major force in Jewish education reform.<\/p>\n Hashiloach takes its name from an early Hebrew-language journal founded in 1897 by the Zionist essayist and gadfly Ahad Ha\u2019am and later edited by the revered poet Hayim Nachman Bialik before folding in 1919. Tikvah\u2019s choice of that name for its journal might be deemed ironic, given the contrast between the liberal stance of the original Hashiloach, which championed a spiritual, anti-nationalist brand of Zionism, and the hard-line politics of the current incarnation.<\/p>\n On the other hand, the choice is in character for the Bernstein family of publications, which tend to combine their core political conservatism with a free-wheeling cultural sensibility and an openness to diverse, challenging ideas.<\/p>\n Still, Smotrich\u2019s right-wing theories are a stretch even for the free-wheeling, open-ended conservatism of Bernstein-world. The notion of a mass population transfer to rid Israel of Palestinians, even if imagined as somehow voluntary, has long been consigned to the fetid corners of Israel\u2019s radical right. If it\u2019s now moved into the mainstream to the point where it can be taken seriously in a distinguished journal of ideas, that\u2019s a depressing comment on the current state of Israeli and Jewish political discourse. If, on the other hand, it hasn\u2019t gained that sort of broad respectability, then its appearance in Hashiloach suggests an alarming erosion of moral focus in Jewish neoconservative thought, as represented by the Tikvah Fund and its affiliates.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" It sounds bad, but separating groups is sometimes the best way of maintaining peace. By contrasting, living in many types of diversity tends to reduce trust and increase tension. J.J. Goldberg writes: A Major Jewish Philanthropist Just Published A Plan … Continue reading