{"id":115773,"date":"2017-07-14T15:11:41","date_gmt":"2017-07-14T23:11:41","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/?p=115773"},"modified":"2017-07-16T13:03:55","modified_gmt":"2017-07-16T21:03:55","slug":"the-fascism-of-yaakov-moshe-harlap","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/?p=115773","title":{"rendered":"The Fascism Of Yaakov Moshe Harlap"},"content":{"rendered":"

In his fifth lecture<\/a> on R. Yaakov Moshe Harlap<\/a>, Marc Shapiro says: “His stress on the land of Israel…is not just super-Zionism but bordering on fascism. If you tell me that is the Jewish approach, then the Jewish approach is fascist…. Racialism.”<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

R. Moshe Harlap<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n

Marc: “Rav Harlap comes to this only through Jewish sources. He’s not influenced by Western nationalisms… This is just out of his kabbalistic reading.”<\/p>\n

“There will come a time when the world will move beyond nationalism to universalism. There will no longer be any distinctions between non-Jewish nations. There will always be a distinction between Jewish people [and goyim].”<\/p>\n

“Rav Harlap completely rejects any desire or need for non-Jewish culture. The people Israel is a holy one who dwells alone and is not counted among the nations. Any drawing from alien sources nullifies its purity and the other nations shall not be able to attain their [repair] except through surrender to the pure and original truth of Israel. If Israel lowers itself by grazing in alien pastures, it will not fulfill its destiny.”<\/p>\n

“We cannot attain eretz Yisrael until we abandon the culture of other worlds. We do not need any culture or language or learn from them how to run a government. Everything is written in our Jewish sources. We have to reject the ways of the goyim and just follow the Torah.”<\/p>\n

“Even Satmar doesn’t act this way. Satmar only takes the bad from the gentiles.”<\/p>\n

“The nations are not able to compare themselves to Israel in any way… The difference between a Jew and a gentile is like the difference between light and darkness.”<\/p>\n

“This becomes a standard view among kabbalists and right-wing types in Israel. When Rav Harlap was writing this, it was not the sort of thing public figures were writing about. It’s not the sort of thing you’d want made public.”<\/p>\n

“Jewish nationalism is raised beyond this world and the non-Jews can’t connect to it. The non-Jews recognize this and so they are opposed to any attempt by Israel to realize its uniqueness and so they fight against Jewish nationalism.”<\/p>\n

Rav Harlap: “Jews have an entire different body… Jews are a different species.”<\/p>\n

“When the nations repent, it is only out of fear of punishment.”<\/p>\n

“Even the sinners of Israel are not doing it out of fear of punishment but because internally they have a higher purpose because Jews are essentially holy. When Jews sin, it is only a sin on the outside. On the inside, they remain holy. Non-Jews cannot be holy even if they follow the Seven Laws of the Sons of Noah. Non-Jews cannot achieve their tikkun until they recognize the greatness of Israel and they have to follow the Jews’ lead.”<\/p>\n

“The non-Jews are within nature. Jews can move beyond nature.”<\/p>\n

“Is the typical messianic idea that Jews will rule the entire world and the entire world will see Israel as its ruler? I’m not sure that is the job we want.”<\/p>\n

Did Rav Kook create or attract freaky extremists? Attract. <\/p>\n

Forward, Dec. 19, 2003<\/a>: <\/p>\n

Charedi Rabbis Rush To Disavow Anti-Gentile Book<\/p>\n

Leaders of the country\u2019s most prominent ultra-Orthodox yeshiva are scrambling to distance themselves from a book by one of their disciples, which argues that gentiles are \u201ccompletely evil\u201d and Jews constitute a separate, genetically superior species.<\/p>\n

Written by Rabbi Saadya Grama \u2014 an alumnus of Beth Medrash Govoha, the renowned yeshiva in Lakewood, N.J. \u2014 the self-published book attempts to employ classical Jewish sources in defense of a race-based theory of Jewish supremacy. Grama\u2019s book, published in Hebrew under the title \u201cRomemut Yisrael Ufarashat Hagalut,\u201d includes flowery endorsements from the most revered religious scholars at the renowned Lakewood yeshiva, including the institution\u2019s foremost religious leader, or rosh yeshiva, Rabbi Aryeh Malkiel Kotler.<\/p>\n

Yet, in a statement issued Tuesday in response to queries from the Forward, Kotler rejected Grama\u2019s philosophy and said that he had not carefully reviewed the text prior to endorsing it.<\/p>\n

\u201cWe have seen the objectionable statements that allegedly appear in a sefer [book] written by Rabbi Grama, a former student at our yeshivah,\u201d wrote Kotler, whose late grandfather Rabbi Aharon Kotler founded the Lakewood yeshiva. \u201cI did glance briefly at the book but did not read it carefully \u2014 which is the general practice in providing approbations to the many books by alumni that come across a desk like mine.\u201d<\/p>\n

In his rare statement to the press, Kotler added: \u201cIn looking at the specific points allegedly contained in the sefer, I can certainly tell you that they are not reflective of normative Jewish thought and are certainly not the philosophy of our yeshivah. Our philosophy asserts that every human being is created in the image of the Lord and the primacy of integrity and honesty in all dealings without exception. I strongly repudiate any assertions in the name of Judaism that do not represent and reflect this philosophy.\u201d<\/p>\n

The statement Tuesday struck a dramatically different chord from Kotler\u2019s earlier endorsement of the book, in which he said Grama has written \u201con the subjects of the Exile, the Election of Israel and her exaltation above and superiority to all of the other nations, all in accordance with the viewpoint of the Torah, based on the solid instruction he has received from his teachers.\u201d<\/p>\n

Kotler\u2019s disavowal of the book on Tuesday came at the end of an intense, day-long scramble during which the Anti-Defamation League and the chancellor of Yeshiva University condemned the book, and several ultra-Orthodox communal spokesmen tried to convince the Forward not to report its existence. During the course of the day, a popular bookstore in the heavily Orthodox Boro Park section of Brooklyn told the Forward that it had just pulled the book off of the tables at the author\u2019s request.<\/p>\n

The controversy over Grama\u2019s book comes as the yeshiva is close to securing $500,000 in federal funds for a Holocaust library (see accompanying story on Page 4).<\/p>\n

Coincidentally, in his book, Grama argues that the Holocaust was both a divine punishment against the Jews for assimilation and also proof of the \u201ctrue nature and face\u201d of the non-Jewish world. The book\u2019s title could be translated in several ways, including \u201cThe Grandeur of Israel and the Issue of Exile\u201d and \u201cJewish Superiority and the Question of Exile.\u201d<\/p>\n

Grama did not return a call seeking clarification on this point and other questions about his polemic.<\/p>\n

In his book, Grama writes: \u201cThe difference between the people of Israel and the nations of the world is an essential one. The Jew by his source and in his very essence is entirely good. The goy, by his source and in his very essence is completely evil. This is not simply a matter of religious distinction, but rather of two completely different species.\u201d<\/p>\n

Grama\u2019s explanation of the Holocaust, as well as his other theories, drew harsh criticism from Rabbi Norman Lamm, chancellor of Yeshiva University and the rosh hayeshiva of its affiliated seminary. Lamm said that his only knowledge of the book came from passages provided to him by the Forward, but that he rejected what he understood to be Grama\u2019s arguments.<\/p>\n

\u201cIt is a book by someone who has obviously taken leave of his senses and adopted the kind of racism that was used against Jews since the beginning of time,\u201d said Lamm, one of Modern Orthodoxy\u2019s most prominent leaders. \u201cI almost feel like offering a conjecture that it was written by an antisemite posing as a rabbi.\u201d<\/p>\n

Lamm added: \u201cThe passages that I have read managed to offend everyone \u2014 the Torah, the martyrs of the Holocaust, the Jewish ideals of justice and the essential divinity that inheres in every human being regardless of religion, race or ethnic origin.\u201d<\/p>\n

In an effort to back up his arguments, Grama draws on an array of racist sources ranging from medieval theological tracts to the writings of Friedrich Nietzsche to the works of Nazi figures. Among other things, Grama argues:<\/p>\n

\u2022 The differences between Jews and gentiles are not religious, historical, cultural or political. They are, rather, racial, genetic and scientifically unalterable. The one group is at its very root and by natural constitution \u201ctotally evil\u201d while the other is \u201ctotally good.\u201d<\/p>\n

\u2022 Jewish successes in the world are completely contingent upon the failure of all other peoples. Only when the gentiles face total catastrophe do the Jews experience good fortune.<\/p>\n

\u2022 The Jews themselves brought about their own destruction during the Holocaust, since they arrogantly endeavored to overcome their very essence, dictated by divine law, by leaving their ghettoes and trying to assimilate into Christian European society. The confrontational approach of the Zionists, their boycott of German products and anti-Nazi demonstrations in particular, only exacerbated the peril to European Jewry. For this they were massacred by Hitler who, while himself an evil person, was acting as God\u2019s agent in punishing the Jews.<\/p>\n

Grama also argues that in opposition to Zionism\u2019s advocacy of Jewish national self-assertion and self-defense, which he views as an imitation of \u201cgentile ways,\u201d the Torah mandates that the Jews, while in exile, should employ such means as appeasement, deception, duplicity and even \u201cbribery\u201d in their dealing with gentiles, so as to avoid their wrath.<\/p>\n

Grama\u2019s full-blown racialist theories appear to break new ground, building on a handful of hints of national and racial chauvinism occasionally found in the writings of a few earlier rabbinic figures, but combining them into a racialist doctrine with no precedent in rabbinic literature. To be sure, a minority stream exists in the rabbinic tradition \u2014 from the 11th- and 12th-century Hebrew romantic poet Yehuda Halevy to the 18th century chasidic sage Levi Yitzhak of Berditchev \u2014 which sees the differences between Jew and gentile as innate, rather than merely religious. Perhaps the most extreme version of this view is found in the central text of Chabad chasidism, Tanya, whose author, Rabbi Shneur Zalman of Lyadi, Chabad\u2019s founder, maintained that Jewish and gentile souls are fundamentally different, the former \u201cdivine\u201d and the latter \u201canimalistic.\u201d That viewpoint has gained ground in recent decades, particularly among charedi thinkers.<\/p>\n

Rabbi Yitzhak Ginsburgh, who is considered one of the leading ideologues of the Israeli Chabad movement, has written and spoken widely on the superiority of Jews and was briefly imprisoned in Israel for racial incitement. Yated Ne\u2019eman, an Orthodox weekly in upstate New York that is affiliated with one of Israel\u2019s main charedi dailies, has published essays on the question of whether medical research can be understood to apply to Jews given the innate physiological differences between Jews and gentiles.<\/p>\n

Such arguments, however, have historically stood in tension with the prevailing rabbinic view that the righteous gentiles of the world \u2014 those who exhibit the basic ethical and moral behavior encapsulated in the \u201cSeven Laws of Noah\u201d \u2014 had the same access to personal salvation as fully observant Jews. This view was summed up in the 12th century by Moses Maimonides, arguably the most important Jewish sage of the past millennium, when he wrote in his code of Jewish law: \u201cAnyone who accepts the Seven Laws of Noah and is careful to observe them is one of the righteous among the nations of the world and he has a portion in the world to come.\u201d<\/p>\n

Critics complained that Grama\u2019s racial theories also conflicts with ancient and medieval rabbinic rules mandating equal treatment in all realms for converts to Judaism.<\/p>\n

Grama frequently quotes Biblical verses that advocate terribly harsh treatment of the pagan inhabitants of ancient Canaan, implying that the same standards ought to be applied to his non-Jewish neighbors in America. By doing so, he appears to disregard extensive rabbinic deliberations dating back to the early medieval period whose general consensus was that Christianity and Islam are licit, monotheistic faiths. The net result of these medieval rabbinic deliberations was to limit the application of such Biblical laws to ancient pagans, and to mandate that Muslims and Christians could not be classified together with the idol-worshippers of earlier times.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

From the book, Rethinking the Messianic Idea in Judaism<\/a>:<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

Marc: “This is not something Rav Harlap made up… It is not new. It is found in standard texts. You can chart that as Jews are persecuted, negative views of non-Jews come out, and as Jews are welcomed, you have more positive views [of non-Jews]. I don’t see how this doesn’t become dangerous when it becomes the motivating principle.” <\/p>\n

“Moshe says David Duke quotes that stuff as well. Every tradition has difficult texts. So what to do? Islam has these texts and plenty of Muslims follow these views. It’s not fair to just take these texts. We also have these texts, that the best of non-Jews should be killed, that the best of doctor should be killed… Shuls are filled with doctors. You have to know how the text has been interpreted and has it been actualized or not. How do people live? It is not enough to cite a text.”<\/p>\n

“That any Jews would give up his personality and submerge himself in someone else goes against the Lithuanian approach.”<\/p>\n

“Some of his reflections on the Holocaust are troubling to me.”<\/p>\n

“With these great figures, we have to speak of enduring elements and transitory elements. No one ever assumes, unless you are a hassid, that you need to adopt everything of every figure. Not everything is enduring… Who’s greater than the Rambam? Not everything the Rambam said [has been widely accepted]… You have to judge the totality. Rav Harlap recognized what the return to the land of Israel means to the Jews.”<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

In his fifth lecture on R. Yaakov Moshe Harlap, Marc Shapiro says: “His stress on the land of Israel…is not just super-Zionism but bordering on fascism. If you tell me that is the Jewish approach, then the Jewish approach is … Continue reading →<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"om_disable_all_campaigns":false,"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[29672,37,29615,110],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-115773","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-fascism","category-israel","category-nationalism","category-rabbis"],"aioseo_notices":[],"aioseo_head":"\n\t\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t