Just as some Jews are paranoid that some Jews are really goyim, so too many goyim are paranoid that some goyim are really Jews. Both sides are equally prone to virtue signalling and purity spiraling. Acclaim in each group usually goes to those leaders who are most hostile to the other group. You can never be too paranoid about the goyim to succeed in Jewish life and you can never be too paranoid about the Jews to succeed in white nationalism. <\/p>\n
Greg Johnson writes<\/a>:<\/p>\n I met Mike Enoch in December of 2014 at an NRx gathering in Manhattan. I instantly recognized his voice and struck up a conversation. He gave me his normie email address, and later that evening, on the long Metro North ride back to Westchester County, I did a Google search on his name and put together a pretty full picture of his life, including his wife\u2019s Jewish surname. I leaned back on the uncomfortable bench, closed my eyes, and thought, \u201cI wonder how long this star will streak across the firmament before burning out.\u201d <\/p>\n I had just discovered The Daily Shoah and The Right Stuff the month before, on the recommendation of Charles Krafft, but I was already a big fan. I believed that their combination of satire and serious analysis could reach a large audience, and since the Death Panel consisted of ex-Libertarians who were evolving in the direction of racial nationalism \u2014 and bringing their audience along with them \u2014 I believed the Shoah was performing a valuable educational function.<\/p>\n At the time, the Death Panel did not really identify as White Nationalists, but they were wise to race and the Jewish question, and given their trajectory, I knew it was only a matter of time. In February of 2015, Mike went to the American Renaissance conference and returned calling himself a White Nationalist.<\/p>\n Given Mike\u2019s opsec practices, I knew that the information about his wife would eventually leak out, and I knew it would create problems. In 2015 he tightened his opsec considerably, but by then quite a few people knew.<\/p>\n When we met, Mike\u2019s ideological views were still evolving. I expected, however, that his personal loyalties would prevent him from fully understanding the Jewish problem and concluding that whites and Jews need a racial divorce. But I was wrong about that. His personal attachments did not cloud his objectivity, but I wondered how he squared it with his marriage. I decided, however, not to ask. I would see if he would bring it up on his own.<\/p>\n We saw each other a number of times in 2015, and during a long train trip back from a pool party at Seventh Son\u2019s, he brought the topic up. It was really his first opportunity to do so. It turns out that Mike told his trusted real world associates about his wife whenever he found an appropriate time and place. He did not hide the truth from his friends or deceive us in any way. I told him that his confidence was safe with me, and I kept it.<\/p>\n Did Mike owe this information to the rest of the world? No, he did not. He told everyone he trusted, and he kept it from those he didn\u2019t know or didn\u2019t trust. That\u2019s as much openness as anyone can reasonably expect. I know some of his fans feel betrayed, but you don\u2019t own a piece of him. Beyond that, chances are, you use pen names and keep your private life private. After all, this is a dissident movement. Our ideas make us targets. Thus we have the right to determine our own level of explicitness and involvement. And everyone else needs to respect those choices. That goes a hundredfold for people who are actually creating something important.<\/p>\n The truth about Mike\u2019s marriage might not fit with many people\u2019s image of him, but a lot of those images are false. The Daily Shoah is not a neo-Nazi podcast. It does not support a paranoid and conspiratorial view of the Jewish question. It mocks lies and sanctimony about the Holocaust, but it does not advocate genocide.<\/p>\n As an aside, given the large number of people who knew the truth about Mike\u2019s marriage \u2014 including people people from his libertarian days, some of whom had bitter fallings-out with him \u2014 I am not surprised that he was eventually doxed. The only surprise is that it took so long. I am not convinced that the dox comes from insiders at all. But if it did, then the fact that it has taken this long proves that, for all their faults, people in our milieu are much better than I suspected.<\/p>\n I am not going to violate the privacy of Mike and his wife. But, by way of correcting some false statements floating around, I will confirm four things. First, she is half-Jewish through her father. Second, she does not have a strong sense of Jewish identity and ethnocentrism. Third, she was aware of Mike\u2019s work and supportive of it. Fourth, she works as a freelance photographer \u2014 not for B\u2019nai Brith or the National Security Agency or a corporate diversity office or any of the other rumors, which are simply created by malevolent people out of whole cloth.<\/p>\n One more false statement floating around is that Mike is a Jew. I have no reason to believe that. I have seen no evidence for that claim, and I think that if he were, he would have leveled with me about that as well…<\/p><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Just as some Jews are paranoid that some Jews are really goyim, so too many goyim are paranoid that some goyim are really Jews. Both sides are equally prone to virtue signalling and purity spiraling. Acclaim in each group usually … Continue reading