I don’t see why white supremacy is any more dangerous and disgusting than other forms of racial supremacy such as Filipino supremacy, Chinese supremacy, Japanese supremacy, Jewish supremacy, black supremacy, Christian supremacy.<\/p>\n
Every group with spirit wants as much power and influence as possible, particularly over its own affairs. Is is Jewish supremacist for Jews to have the Jewish state of Israel? Surely many non-Jews in Israel don’t like being a minority. Surely these goyim citizens of Israel would prefer it if Israel was multi-cultural with no one ethnic identity. It’s not easy being a minority. I sympathize. Minorities everywhere have it tough. That’s why there are separate countries so that people who want to live as a majority with their own kind can do so.<\/p>\n
Every important people (such as the Chinese, Japanese, Jews, Nordics) see themselves as marked out by the will of heaven for some transcendental purpose. So what if whites organize in this fashion just as other groups do? I’m sure latinos enjoy their growing population and importance in the United States. <\/p>\n
How come you hear often about “white supremacy” but rarely about black supremacy or Jewish supremacy? If you watch the NBA or the NFL, it looks like black supremacy to me. If you watch Wall Street or Hollywood or pundits, it sure looks like Jewish supremacy to me. Are these supremacies dangerous? Well, different groups have different interests, so it makes sense that as one group gains in power, other groups are by necessity reduced in power. <\/p>\n
You might argue that white supremacy is particularly dangerous because of Hitler. Well, plenty of other people have carried out genocide aside from Hitler. You might as well argue that belief in equality is dangerous because of communism’s genocides. <\/p>\n
Los Angeles Times Nov. 29, 2016<\/a>:<\/p>\n \nPaul Joseph Watson, an editor for the conspiracy-minded site InfoWars,\u00a0said\u00a0in July that he was \u201cin the alt-right,\u201d but then denied it\u00a0last week, going on to argue that two different factions of the group\u00a0had emerged. I don’t see why white supremacy is any more dangerous and disgusting than other forms of racial supremacy such as Filipino supremacy, Chinese supremacy, Japanese supremacy, Jewish supremacy, black supremacy, Christian supremacy. Every group with spirit wants as much power … Continue reading
\n\u201cOne is more accurately described as the New Right. These people like to wear MAGA [Make America Great Again]\u00a0hats, create memes & have fun,\u201d Watson wrote on Facebook, criticizing mainstream media for focusing on Trump\u2019s racist supporters. \u201cThey include whites, blacks, Asians, Latinos, gays and everyone else. These are the people who helped Trump win the election.
\n\u201cThe other faction likes to fester in dark corners of sub-reddits\u201d \u2014 a reference to branches of the social-media site Reddit \u2014 \u201cand obsess about Jews, racial superiority and Adolf Hitler. This is a tiny fringe minority. They had no impact on the election.\u201d
\nSome white nationalists themselves have a term for the split: the alt-right\u00a0versus the \u201calt-lite.\u201d
\nWhite nationalists are\u00a0alt-right\u00a0and right-wing sites like Breitbart News and its chairman, the new White House advisor Stephen K. Bannon, are alt-lite,\u00a0according to Brad Griffin, a white nationalist who blogs under the pen name Hunter Wallace at the site Occidental Dissent.
\n\u201cSteve Bannon is the most important figure in the alt-lite,\u201d Griffin wrote.\u00a0\u201cWe all see Breitbart as the premier alt-lite website which has popularized a diluted version of our beliefs.\u201d
\nBreitbart News, which channels a more nationalistic form of mainstream conservatism,\u00a0gained notoriety over the last year both for implicitly supporting Trump\u2019s candidacy and for Bannon\u2019s proud announcement to Mother Jones in August, \u201cWe’re the platform for the alt-right.\u201d
\nLeft-wing critics have called the site a front for white nationalism\u00a0and anti-Semitism, which its staffers have vigorously denied.
\nBannon and Breitbart staffers have distanced themselves from the alt-right label, which Bannon defined in a postelection\u00a0interview with the Wall Street Journal as \u201cyounger people who are anti-globalists, very nationalist, terribly anti-establishment.\u201d
\nBannon said alt-right supporters had\u00a0\u201csome racial and anti-Semitic overtones\u201d that he said he disagreed with, and that Breitbart News\u00a0provides \u201can outlet for 10 or 12 or 15 lines of thought,\u201d of which the alt-right is \u201ca tiny part.\u201d
\nThe heightened scrutiny of the alt-right has led mainstream institutions to draw tougher policies on addressing the movement.
\nAfter the election, Twitter banished many prominent far-right users from its service, which had been a staging ground for racist, sexist and anti-Jewish attacks against public figures and journalists.
\nMany supporters have since retreated to the new social-media service\u00a0Gab, which bills itself as a safe space from censorship. At one point last week, at least six of Gab\u2019s top 10 trending hashtags either referenced Trump or the alt-right.
\n\u201cGab I love you,\u201d\u00a0a\u00a0user named \u201cDeplorable Daniel\u201d posted on Nov. 22. \u201cBut man there is a scary amount of Nazis or National Socialists. I feel like Gab may be under Attack.\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"