{"id":108885,"date":"2016-10-20T04:54:37","date_gmt":"2016-10-20T12:54:37","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/?p=108885"},"modified":"2016-10-20T04:58:08","modified_gmt":"2016-10-20T12:58:08","slug":"steve-sailer-the-unanswered-question-would-hillary-accept-defeat-or-would-she-blame-russian-hackers","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/?p=108885","title":{"rendered":"Steve Sailer: The Unanswered Question: Would Hillary Accept Defeat or Would She Blame Russian Hackers?"},"content":{"rendered":"

Steve Sailer writes<\/a>: Would Hillary peacefully accept the verdict of the polls or would she demand that Obama strike back at Russia for rigging the election?<\/p>\n

COMMENTS:<\/p>\n

* Another Unanswered Quesion: Why do liberals say they\u2019ll move to Canada, rather than Mexico, if Trump wins? Why do they so strongly prefer our northern neighbor?<\/p>\n

* A even more interesting question is whether the military would obey the orders of a lame-duck President acting on behalf of a defeated candidate, especially if Donald Trump countermands the order? More likely, Hillary will not accept the electoral results and will challenge votes in swing states. Trump might do the same thing. I wonder if we might have the spectacle of rival electoral college results and rival inaugurations\u2013whose orders will the military and police follow then?<\/p>\n

* It\u2019s about time we questioned the legitimacy of American electoral politics, is it not?<\/p>\n

How legitimate is a result brought about by the importation of millions of foreigners against the will of the majority?<\/p>\n

* If Russia wants to decide the outcome of US elections, it should do it the honest way, i.e. buy up the American media and Hollywood.<\/p>\n

\n

So @cnn<\/a> claims that the election can't be hacked, but the Russians have already hacked it. pic.twitter.com\/EWucedIYA1<\/a><\/p>\n

— RAMZPAUL (@ramzpaul) October 20, 2016<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n