{"id":108627,"date":"2016-10-11T11:38:48","date_gmt":"2016-10-11T19:38:48","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/?p=108627"},"modified":"2016-10-11T11:38:48","modified_gmt":"2016-10-11T19:38:48","slug":"the-second-debate","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/?p=108627","title":{"rendered":"The Second Debate"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><A HREF=\"http:\/\/blog.dilbert.com\/post\/151599421561\/quick-debate-reactions-from-switzerland\">Scott Adams blogs<\/a>:<\/p>\n<p>Some quick reactions\u2026<\/p>\n<p>1. When the Access Hollywood tape came up, Trump dismissed it as locker room banter that he regrets. You expected that part. The persuasion move was that he quickly contrasted that \u201csmall\u201d issue with images of ISIS beheadings, and cage-drownings. It was a high ground maneuver, a powerful visual anchor (like the Rosie O\u2019Donnell move from his first primary debate), and a contrast play. In this framing, Trump cares about saving your life while Clinton cares about your choice of words. I realize the issue is Trump\u2019s alleged deeds, not his words. But in terms of debate persuasion, Trump nailed it hard.<\/p>\n<p>2. Clinton\u2019s body language was defensive. Trump is physically larger and prowled the stage. He won the optics. It only got worse when a fly landed on Clinton\u2019s face mid-answer. Both candidates looked perfect in terms of wardrobe and hair, given what they have to work with.<\/p>\n<p>3. Trump threw in enough random details about Syria to persuade viewers that he knows more than they thought he knew. And he did a great job selling the idea that he knows more than the generals (as ridiculous as that sounds), at least in terms of not announcing where we plan to attack. I agree with the moderator who said there might be good reasons for announcing attacks \u2013 such as giving time for civilians to leave \u2013 but it wasn\u2019t quite a counter-argument. Trump succeeded in looking informed on Syria, and at the same time reinforced the \u201ccan\u2019t keep a secret\u201d theme for Clinton.<\/p>\n<p>4. Trump\u2019s pre-debate show with Bill\u2019s alleged victims dismantled Clinton\u2019s pro-woman high ground before the debate even started. I didn\u2019t see the pre-debate show, but I assume it was impactful. It had to be. Clinton looked shaken from the start.<\/p>\n<p>5. The best quotable moments from the debate are pro-Trump. His comment about putting Clinton in jail has that marvelous visual persuasion quality about it, and it was the laugh of the night, which means it will be repeated endlessly. He also looked like he meant it.<\/p>\n<p>Clinton\u2019s Abe Lincoln defense for two-faced politicking failed as hard as anything can fail. Mrs. Clinton, I knew Abe Lincoln, and you\u2019re no Abe Lincoln. You know that was in your head. Or it will be. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Scott Adams blogs: Some quick reactions\u2026 1. When the Access Hollywood tape came up, Trump dismissed it as locker room banter that he regrets. You expected that part. The persuasion move was that he quickly contrasted that \u201csmall\u201d issue with &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/?p=108627\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"om_disable_all_campaigns":false,"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[21791],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-108627","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-america"],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/108627","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=108627"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/108627\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":108628,"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/108627\/revisions\/108628"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=108627"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=108627"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=108627"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}