{"id":108099,"date":"2016-09-28T13:00:53","date_gmt":"2016-09-28T21:00:53","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/?p=108099"},"modified":"2016-09-28T13:40:34","modified_gmt":"2016-09-28T21:40:34","slug":"i-dont-think-venezuela-is-sending-us-their-best","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/?p=108099","title":{"rendered":"I Don’t Think Venezuela Is Sending Us Their Best"},"content":{"rendered":"

Comments at Steve Sailer<\/a>:<\/p>\n

* NBC\u2019s Today show just ran a lengthy interview of Machado, leading with a clip of Clinton at the debate, \u201cDonald, she has a name. Her name is Alicia Machado. And she has become a US citizen and you can bet she is going to vote this November.\u201d The sympathetic segment included the most heart-rending parts of Clinton\u2019s TV ad featuring the former beauty queen\u2019s abuse at the hands of the monster.<\/p>\n

I guess NBC\u2019s newshounds don\u2019t watch CNN. No mention of the getaway car, the threats to the judge, the engagement-wrecking sex tape, or serving as baby mama for the cocaine cartel kingpin.<\/p>\n

When it comes to new U.S. citizens, I\u2019m not certain that Venezuela is sending us their best.<\/p>\n

There\u2019s a rumor that Today has scored a major coup in the Morning News Show ratings wars. They\u2019ve recruited Haven Monahan as the newest Senior National Correspondent.<\/p>\n

* Great coincidences in campaign reporting: The Guardian & Cosmo sent reporters just before debate to profile Machado, then pubbed today.<\/p>\n

* Too bad we didn\u2019t have a fence to keep out this useless eater Venezuelan beauty queen.
\nUSA- not just Mexico and Guatemala\u2019s dumping ground anymore!
\nNow we are the dumping ground for all of Latin America, for all the flotsam and jetsam washing up from Venezuela and everywhere south of the United States of America.<\/p>\n

* \u201cHe can say whatever he wants to say. I don\u2019t care. You know, I have my past, of course everybody has a past. And I\u2019m no saint girl. But that is not the point now \u2026 (Trump) was really rude with me, he tried to destroy my self esteem. And now I\u2019m a voice in the Latin community.\u201d<\/p>\n

Ah yes; the unspoken paradigm of our age \u2013 \u201cyeah, okay, so I murdered a few muhfugguhs\u2026.so? Murder just a evvyday thing that happen, nome sane? \u2026.but racism! That shit is juss sick and wrong!\u201d<\/p>\n

* This story about Alicia Machado is backfiring on Hillary and the MSM so badly it makes the birtherism affair look like a political masterstroke by comparison.<\/p>\n

* We all have a past. I\u2019ve been a getaway driver for assassins and threatened to kill judges many times \u2013 who hasn\u2019t? Now can we get back to Donald Trump and his fat shaming. Fat shaming is the most important issue facing America today.<\/p>\n

* This morning on Fox News, the announcer said an upcoming segment was going to examine whether Trump\u2019s comments about Alicia Machado were blown up out of proportion.<\/p>\n

If Ms. Machado put on 60 pounds, as CNN reported, I\u2019d say she blew herself up out of proportion.<\/p>\n

* The focus should be on how does someone of such obviously low moral character become a U.S. citizen in the first place? What skills is she bringing to our country and how are we better off that she is living here?<\/p>\n

* There seems to be another complication brewing, which is that there are numerous hardcore porn videos featuring an \u201cAlicia Machado\u201d, who is billed as a former Miss Venezuela or somesuch. Not gonna link (for obvious reasons), and I didn\u2019t watch them, but the lady in the stills bears a striking resemblance.<\/p>\n

* These Alicia Machado stories are hysterically funny; it\u2019s amazing that Hillary would use this individual to promote her campaign. Who came up with this idea, anyway? Bill?<\/p>\n

I would say that Machado fulfills everyone\u2019s expectations about trashy Latinas, and I think it\u2019s only fair to draw attention to her past activities. Also, she\u2019s very good looking in her various stages of undress. I also think it\u2019s fair to mention \u2014 but not to link \u2014 the references to a sex tape.<\/p>\n

In a way, it\u2019s not fair to discuss someone\u2019s personal life; ad hominem, and so on. But Hillary, and apparently with the cooperation of Ms Machado, chose to select her as a paragon of what the US is and should be. Therefore it\u2019s not only fair to discuss the public career of that paragon, it is necessary.<\/p>\n

I didn\u2019t watch the debate because when I heard Hillary\u2019s voice (my wife is big on HRC) I told my spouse I had to run the extra car to keep the battery up so I just drove around for half an hour.
\nI can\u2019t imagine listening to HRC\u2019s voice for the next four to eight years.<\/p>\n

However, the point is that therefore I first heard about Alicia and Donald\u2019s infamous fat shaming while scrolling my twitter feed the next morning. So naturally this appeared to be a gaffe on Donald\u2019s part. It was an appeal \u2014 perhaps we might say a naked appeal \u2014 for the woman vote, since every woman feels that she is fat, and fat shaming is a political issue. But just as every woman feels that she should lose a few pounds, every woman is going to be envious of a woman of Alicia\u2019s appearance, and moreover, the vast majority of woman are not going to approve of a woman who has made a career out of showing off her body. And that is why this further discussion is necessary.<\/p>\n

As a guy, despite the obvious pleasant scenery, I couldn\u2019t care less. However, the publicizing of the career of Ms Machado in the wake of the debate has I believe completely neutralized the \u201cSisters Unite!\u201d nature of Hillary\u2019s debate night appeal. And that\u2019s worthwhile.<\/p>\n

* I almost wish Trump would have said, \u201cI\u2019ve called men a lot worse things, Sweetie.\u201d<\/p>\n

And then maybe go on to point out that 99% of the soldiers killed in the damn Iraq war she voted for have been what her most ardent followers like to refer to as \u201cmales.\u201d So don\u2019t compare my decision to tweak an irresponsible beauty contest winner 20 years ago to the seriously damaging decisions you have made in your years of \u201cpublic service.\u201d<\/p>\n

* Speaking of loaded language. Here\u2019s the opening of the Editorial Steve linked to in a different entry:<\/p>\n

\u201c\u2026 When Mrs. Clinton finally got to unload what felt like the pent-up frustration of Everywoman, it was powerful.\u201d<\/p>\n

Powerful!<\/p>\n

And it was \u201cpent up,\u201d because God knows she\u2019s never had an opportunity express this grievance earlier.<\/p>\n

* It seems that Ms. Machado has a problem with la verdad<\/i>. Megyn Kelly on Fox last night asked her about a contradiction<\/a> about when she got her \u201ceating disorder.\u201d In 1997 Machado told WaPo she was already barfing up her arepas<\/a> in preparation for the pageant.<\/p>\n

Machado stays on the \u201cTrump bad\u201d message:<\/p>\n

\u201cI\u2019m heeere because I know dis person and he nada good person. Dad is de poyn.\u201d<\/p>\n

* Can you even be a Miss Universe contestant and be a feminist?<\/p>\n

* Trump could not have designed a more perfect case in point, for what Democrats do with immigration, than this woman. Hillary finds a repugnant alien from a Socialist hellhole, who obviously does not have the qualities we look for in a citizen, but who is ready to bring her Socialist country\u2019s narcissistic sense of personal entitlement to all the riches of our country; said alien then proceeds to shill for the treasonous political elites who hooked her up with access to native whites\u2019 social and financial capital, promising to vote against the idea that America and its people should come first; when we are not sufficiently obsequious in this process, they have the temerity to spit in our faces and call us racists.<\/p>\n

This is obviously illustrative of our immigration problem in its entirety: we should thank Hillary for making our point for us, and publicize the fact everywhere. I think Trump could be almost as angry and hostile to Hillary as he wanted on this topic in the next debate, with excellent results. I keep hearing people say that Hillary is actually quite smart and has been seasoned by years of political manoeuvering, and that Trump should beware her political acumen. That sounds like it should be true, but I keep concluding that, in fact, she and the rest of the Left have simply never faced real opposition. If one is willing to strike back, they have left themselves open to any number of devastating attacks.<\/p>\n

* I think its the duty of men on the alt-right, or just plain old responsible white guys of republican virtue, to stop coddling political nonsense in their women.<\/p>\n

Lay it out: \u201cThis is a war against white people, against Western civilization\u2013against everything i inherited from my ancestors and hope to pass down to our civilization. If you vote against our civilization you\u2019re voting against me and our children\u2019s future. It is not acceptable and i\u2019m not going to tolerate it. It\u2019s a bright line for me.\u201d<\/p>\n

I\u2019ll leave the question of a spanking and what follows it to you. But it\u2019s long past time that white men stopped tolerating adolescent political stupidity in their women.<\/p>\n

* What would be unforgivable to me as an employer is the lack of background vetting. Hasn\u2019t HRC\u2019s staff ever heard of Google? Anybody who can use a browser could have found out in half an hour what a nutcase adventuress (love that word) this babe is, but no doubt HRC\u2019s staff think they are so much smarter than everyone else.<\/p>\n

* Someone uploaded this 1997 CNN video featuring Trump and Machado. I don\u2019t know if someone else has posted it on another thread. I apologize if they did. But if you haven\u2019t seen it, watch it. Trump is amazingly nice to this woman. And she seems very cheerful and friendly to Trump. Anyone watching this will come away thinking Trump is a good guy.<\/p>\n