{"id":107520,"date":"2016-09-22T12:18:24","date_gmt":"2016-09-22T20:18:24","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/?p=107520"},"modified":"2016-09-22T12:37:34","modified_gmt":"2016-09-22T20:37:34","slug":"let-in-one-paki-you-bring-in-another-200-through-family-reunification","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/?p=107520","title":{"rendered":"Let In One Paki, You Bring In Another 200 Through Family Reunification"},"content":{"rendered":"

Comments at Steve Sailer<\/a>:<\/p>\n

* Once I ran across an Internet short that argued that if you let in one Pakistani, you let in over 200 after family unification. There is sense to that claim.<\/p>\n

I worked in the Middle East for a decade. It was common practice for Third Country Nationals (TCN) from especially Pakistan and Bangladesh to bring forged documents with them documenting their having Health Certificates as well as having graduated from a university. Birth certificates were also readily forged.<\/p>\n

Hence, letting in one immigrant from Pakistan sets the conditions for \u201cbrothers\u201d, \u201csisters\u201d, \u201ccousins\u201d, \u201cgrandparents\u201d, and even \u201cspouses\u201d to be part of family unification. You would not believe how large these \u201cfamilies\u201d can be. Then, after a while, it is time for family unification for the \u201cbrothers\u201d, \u201csisters\u201d, \u201ccousins\u201d and the\u201d spouses\u201d they left behind \u2026 with their \u201cbrothers\u201d, \u201csisters\u201d, \u201ccousins\u201d, and \u201cgrandparents\u201d queuing up for their turn at family unification.<\/p>\n

It is entirely feasible that, over time, one Pakistani could import an entire village. Indeed, I live in a highly international community in a Washington DC suburb. As I watch people walking the streets in their native garb (especially the women and old folks), I believe that is already happening.<\/p>\n

* If you talk to local law enforcement officers, they\u2019re extremely frustrated by the ongoing lack of direction and cooperation from the federal government regarding illegal aliens in their communities. The Bush\/Obama administrations had\/have no interest in deporting illegals, so once they\u2019ve gone through the local justice system, they go back to doing whatever it is they do. When illegal aliens are charged with something where they can post bail, they\u2019ll just disappear (to some other part of the state). This is why catch and release is so prevalent. Most cops working in sanctuary cities don\u2019t even bother arresting illegals for non-violent offenses.<\/p>\n

In terms of real-world impact, Trump merely unshackling local law enforcement would be yuuuuge. Deputizing and cooperating with them, is truly next-level stuff.<\/p>\n

* I usually get silence in response when I ask what the children of low skill immigrants and refugees will do for careers.<\/p>\n

* Immigration isn\u2019t the only demographic problem we face. Feminism and the higher ed bubble, while not an immediate threat, are still existential threats to the demographic continuity of the traditional America and of Western civilization in general.<\/p>\n

* One issue is that the U.S. doesn\u2019t form new metropolises any more. There are a lot of blank spots on the map where more people could theoretically live, but they won\u2019t, they\u2019ll live in the exurbs of existing metropolitan areas.<\/p>\n

For example, there\u2019s a lot of underutilized land between Santa Barbara and Hearst Castle, but nobody will be allowed to build a new metropolis there. Similarly, there is a lot of empty land in less desirable parts of the country, but nobody will want to build a city there.<\/p>\n

* One of the funny things about Hillary\u2019s ad blitz is that a lot of her ads work equally well as ads for Trump. For example, there\u2019s one where she has one Republican cuck after another talking about how they could never support Trump. To a lot of Democrat and Independent voters, this gives them permission to vote for The Donald. If those SOBs hate Trump, he must be okay! There\u2019s nothing like seeing Lindsey Graham condemn Trump to motivate you to get out and vote for the guy.<\/p>\n

Hillary\u2019s ads also talk about how racist Trump is. I think a lot of people are beginning to realize that, coming from Hillary, \u201cracist\u201d means \u201cdoesn\u2019t hate white people.\u201d<\/p>\n

I had to chuckle when Obama said he would consider it a \u201cpersonal insult\u201d to his legacy if voters (specifically blacks) didn\u2019t go for Hillary. Hey, an opportunity to personally insult the Anointed One? That\u2019s too good to pass up.<\/p>\n

* Story in 3 tweets:<\/p>\n

\n

Keith Lamont Scott. Terence Crutcher. Too many others. This has got to end. -H<\/p>\n

— Hillary Clinton (@HillaryClinton) September 21, 2016<\/a><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n