{"id":106604,"date":"2016-09-13T20:07:15","date_gmt":"2016-09-14T04:07:15","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/?p=106604"},"modified":"2016-09-13T20:07:15","modified_gmt":"2016-09-14T04:07:15","slug":"hillarys-attack-dog-david-brock-bears-scrutiny","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/?p=106604","title":{"rendered":"Hillary’s Attack Dog David Brock Bears Scrutiny"},"content":{"rendered":"

Daily Caller<\/a>: For a journalist actually interested in seeking the truth, there are plenty of questions to ask Brock. In a legal fight that the press has conveniently ignored, Brock\u2019s former long-time live-in boyfriend William Grey (whom Brock has thanked in several of his books) threatened to go to the IRS with damaging information about how Brock was running his Media Matters empire. What did Brock do? He paid Grey $850,000 to keep quiet. Brock reportedly had to sell his home in Rehoboth, Delaware to come up with the money. This certainly seems to indicate that Brock was terrified about what the authorities would uncover.<\/p>\n

If Brock were merely a private citizen, this would simply be a matter between Grey and himself. But Brock is working closely with the Clinton campaign and using his organizations like Media Matters to go after her opponents. If Grey has evidence of wrongdoing on the part of Media Matters and Brock, that has a bearing on larger issues and becomes newsworthy. Why hasn\u2019t the press been interested in this? Brock should follow his own standards of transparency by releasing his records.<\/p>\n

Also of interest would be Brock\u2019s role in the purchase and illegal use of guns in the District of Columbia and elsewhere. As previously reported in the Daily Caller, Brock had a bodyguard, Haydn Price-Morris, carry a loaded gun in the District of Columbia. The Daily Caller reported that \u201cmultiple firearms used to protect the Media Matters founder were purchased with Brock\u2019s blessing \u2014 and apparently with the group\u2019s money.\u201d This is astonishing under any circumstances, but particularly because Brock is so closely aligned with Hillary Clinton, who is strongly in favor of strict gun control laws. Apparently those stricter rules on guns don\u2019t apply to her loyal partisans. Brock should come clean on his role in this story, release all his gun purchase records and reveal whether Media Matters funds were used to purchase firearms. They could start by getting the real story from the bodyguard involved.<\/p>\n

I worked closely with Brock when he wrote his book The Seduction of Hillary Rodham, published in 1996. Brock himself has written in his 2002 memoirs that he believes this was an honest book, and still does today. Seduction contains damning evidence against both Hillary and Bill, but you would never know that from the recent coverage of the book by the New York Times (which called it \u201cflattering\u201d) and others. Many of Brock\u2019s conclusions about Hillary are anything but \u201cflattering\u201d \u2013 in fact, they are downright disturbing, as these easily-verifiable highlights demonstrate.<\/p>\n

Hillary believes that the ends justify the means and that \u201clegal and ethical strictures and standards of accountability\u201d do not apply to her (p. 415);
\nBill\u2019s serial womanizing had instilled in Hillary \u201ca contempt for the democratic process itself\u201d (p. 276-77);
\nHillary\u2019s bad faith \u201cTrojan horse efforts\u201d on health care reform \u201cwould reveal not just surprisingly poor judgment on her part but character flaws of a particularly dangerous and self-destructive sort\u201d (p. 330), and she \u201cemployed means that were questionable in a democracy\u201d (p. 346);
\nShe lied about whether she represented a client before the state when her husband was Governor (p. 265);
\nShe was willing to use the Department of Justice to achieve political ends (p. 312);
\nHer hand-picked White House attorneys stonewalled investigations, acted like \u201cmob lawyers, \u201d and their conduct was a \u201cserious infringement of the public trust\u201d (p. 397);
\nThe Clinton campaign\u2019s use of a thug private eye to intimidate potential witnesses showed that Hillary \u201cwas willing to countenance intimidation of women to cover up Bill\u2019s peccadilloes.\u201d (p. 274)
\nBrock also provided extensive evidence showing that when he was governor of Arkansas, Hillary\u2019s husband ran a vast corrupt administration where he showered favors on and \u201cgreased the wheels of government\u201d for supporters such as Jim McDougal and Dan Lasater (pp. 195-213). Brock finds Bill \u2013 who would remain an important figure in his wife\u2019s White House \u2013 to be a person without any integrity or strength of character (p. 234), and calls him \u201cperhaps the weakest chief executive since Warren Harding.\u201d (p. 289) Brock asserts that \u201c[W]hen a fundamentally weak person like Bill relies on a \u2018moral compass\u2019 that itself becomes askew, the results can be tragic\u2026Bill relied on someone who believed she was simply too good to do wrong.\u201d (p. 417)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Daily Caller: For a journalist actually interested in seeking the truth, there are plenty of questions to ask Brock. In a legal fight that the press has conveniently ignored, Brock\u2019s former long-time live-in boyfriend William Grey (whom Brock has thanked … Continue reading →<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"om_disable_all_campaigns":false,"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[185],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-106604","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-hillary-clinton"],"aioseo_notices":[],"aioseo_head":"\n\t\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t