{"id":106366,"date":"2016-09-13T03:41:24","date_gmt":"2016-09-13T11:41:24","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/?p=106366"},"modified":"2016-09-13T03:41:24","modified_gmt":"2016-09-13T11:41:24","slug":"the-brilliance-of-hillary-clintons-deplorables","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/?p=106366","title":{"rendered":"The brilliance of Hillary Clinton’s ‘deplorables’"},"content":{"rendered":"

Byron York writes<\/a>:<\/p>\n

Could there be a clunkier phrase than “basket of deplorables”? Hillary Clinton’s assertion that half \u2014 or maybe something less than half \u2014 of Donald Trump’s supporters are “racist, sexist, homophobic, xenophobic, Islamophobic, you name it” struck a lot of observers as not just an odd turn of phrase but politically unwise. You attack your opponent, the idea was, but you don’t attack the voters.<\/p>\n

But now, a few days later, the brilliance of Clinton’s remark is becoming clearer. Yes, she got a few liberal commentators to take her side and defend the substance of it. But the far bigger benefit is that in the wake of her comment, some media figures decided to devise a “deplorables” quiz for Trump supporters. Is Person X deplorable? How about Person Y? The effect was to pressure Trump supporters not only to agree with Clinton’s larger point but with her precise terminology.<\/p>\n

That’s what Wolf Blitzer did with Trump running mate Mike Pence Monday. “There are some supporters of Donald Trump and Mike Pence who \u2014 David Duke, for example, some other white nationalists, who would fit into that category of deplorables, right?” Blitzer asked Pence.<\/p>\n

“Well, as I told you last time I was on, I’m not really sure why the media keeps dropping David Duke’s name,” Pence said. “Donald Trump has denounced David Duke repeatedly. We don’t want his support, and we don’t want the support of people who think like him.”<\/p>\n

“Would you call him a deplorable?” Blitzer pressed. “You would call him that?”<\/p>\n

“No, I don’t \u2014 I’m not in the name-calling business, Wolf.”<\/p>\n

So Pence said of Duke: “We don’t want his support, and we don’t want the support of people who think like him.” But that wasn’t enough. Would he use Clinton’s word? And when Pence didn’t \u2014 well, look at the coverage that followed:<\/p>\n

Pence declines to call Duke ‘deplorable” \u2014 Politico.<\/p>\n

Mike Pence refuses to call David Duke ‘deplorable’ \u2014 USA Today.<\/p>\n

Mike Pence declines to say whether David Duke is ‘deplorable’ because he ‘is not in the name-calling business’ \u2014 Washington Post.<\/p>\n

Mike Pence refuses to call David Duke ‘deplorable’ \u2014 Huffington Post.<\/p>\n

Mike Pence declines to call David Duke ‘deplorable,’ disavows support’ \u2014 CNN.<\/p>\n

Mike Pence Denounces David Duke but Won’t Call Him ‘Deplorable’ \u2014 ABC.<\/p>\n

Mike Pence refuses to describe former KKK leader David Duke as ‘deplorable’; ‘I’m not in the name-calling business’ \u2014 New York Daily News.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Byron York writes: Could there be a clunkier phrase than “basket of deplorables”? Hillary Clinton’s assertion that half \u2014 or maybe something less than half \u2014 of Donald Trump’s supporters are “racist, sexist, homophobic, xenophobic, Islamophobic, you name it” struck … Continue reading →<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"om_disable_all_campaigns":false,"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[42685],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-106366","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-david-duke"],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/106366","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=106366"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/106366\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":106367,"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/106366\/revisions\/106367"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=106366"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=106366"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=106366"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}