Most days I have the opportunity to talk to someone with an IQ around 180. It is usually the highlight of my day. I rarely get to finish a joke with this guy because he has already seen the punchline. <\/p>\n
You might think that such a person is a nerd and socially awkward. You would be wrong. Everybody loves him. His beautiful brain makes it effortless for him to see things from another person’s point of view. He has amazing empathy. He has never been stopped by police. He has never had a parking ticket nor a moving violation. He seems to know everybody in Los Angeles with similar brain power. He frequently takes time to do nice things for other people and he seeks out win-win solutions. <\/p>\n
James Thompson writes<\/a>: More likely, they will leave town and search out other eminent people just for the fun of exchanging ideas. Their vocabularies will be above 40,000 words. They are unlikely to believe in gods or superstitions, and can calculate coincidences. (Dick Feynman used to begin his lectures by saying: \u201cAs I parked my car today I noticed that the licence plate of the car in front of me was 79346229. What\u2019s the chance of that?\u201d). They may be seen as unconventional, and can be difficult to understand. In IQ terms they are 155. Call them the Three Sigmas. Most days I have the opportunity to talk to someone with an IQ around 180. It is usually the highlight of my day. I rarely get to finish a joke with this guy because he has already seen the punchline. … Continue reading
\n When such eminent intellects leave town, they soon learn that they are not that bright. After all, even the United Kingdom has 6,500 of them, and they soon work out which the really bright ones are. So, for really interesting minds, we are looking at those who, in open competition, tested on very hard subjects, can show other scary bright people that they are closer to 1 in a million. In IQ terms this would be 160, but it would be simpler to say that they are well above conventional testing limits. Call them the Four Sigmas.
\n Think of Bertrand Russell going up to Cambridge University and finding very few intelligent people there, but later observing that every conversation with John Maynard Keynes was exhausting, and noting he always came away feeling defeated. Or consider John Von Neumann, (from Steve Hsu\u2019s very good account) who made fundamental contributions in mathematics, physics, nuclear weapons research, computer architecture, game theory and automata, and also had formidable powers of mental calculation and a photographic memory. Laureate Eugene Wigner who knew Planck, Heisenberg, Paul Dirac, Leo Szilard, Edward Teller, and Albert Einstein ranked von Neumann the highest in intellect, and the aforementioned luminaries did not question this judgement. A little uncharitably, Enrico Fermi said to Herb Anderson, with whom he ran the first ever nuclear reaction: \u201cYou know, Herb, how much faster I am in thinking than you are. That is how much faster von Neumann is compared to me\u201d. Laureate Hans Bethe, whom I revere, went so far as to say: \u201cI always thought Von Neumann\u2019s brain indicated that he was from another species, an evolution beyond man\u201d. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"