{"id":104495,"date":"2016-08-28T07:38:32","date_gmt":"2016-08-28T15:38:32","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/?p=104495"},"modified":"2016-08-28T07:38:32","modified_gmt":"2016-08-28T15:38:32","slug":"we-need-to-educate-journalists-about-intelligence","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/?p=104495","title":{"rendered":"We Need To Educate Journalists About Intelligence"},"content":{"rendered":"

James Thompson writes<\/a>: The Economist is not a reliable guide to human ability. It believes in homo-economicus: all-purpose, equipotential beings without inherent differences, any such adventitious peculiarities to be smoothed away by compensatory education and the amelioration of unfavourable circumstances.<\/p>\n

Very occasionally, like a maiden aunt reluctantly acknowledging the existence of sexual arousal, they refer to genetic differences, but soon revert to their standard mantra: with more education, earlier education, and more flexible education those nasty gaps between one person and another, and one group and another, can be washed away. Perhaps so.<\/p>\n

As part of a holiday ritual I buy The Economist to take to the beach and find out if it has improved. The issue of June 25th looked promising, in that it had a special report on artificial intelligence, in which they said that the intelligent response to the dislocation caused by this development would be \u201cmaking education and training flexible enough to teach new skills quickly and efficiently\u201d. Quite so. They should have added \u201cbut the intelligent will always learn more quickly and will generalise their learning more widely, and to greater advantage\u201d. Learning speed is correlated with general ability. The US armed forces have all the data, and Linda Gottfredson has dug it up. The Wonderlic data also show that training a person in one simple task in one ability domain does not generalise to improved ability in simple tasks in other ability domains. A task is learned, but the individual is no brighter or faster at learning the next task…<\/p>\n

The Economist is confused about human beings, but if we are to accept their shaky presumptions about the power of pre-school education, then even journalists can be educated, if they can be caught young.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

James Thompson writes: The Economist is not a reliable guide to human ability. It believes in homo-economicus: all-purpose, equipotential beings without inherent differences, any such adventitious peculiarities to be smoothed away by compensatory education and the amelioration of unfavourable circumstances. … Continue reading →<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"om_disable_all_campaigns":false,"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[29582],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-104495","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-iq"],"aioseo_notices":[],"aioseo_head":"\n\t\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t