{"id":103870,"date":"2016-08-18T09:37:39","date_gmt":"2016-08-18T17:37:39","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/?p=103870"},"modified":"2016-08-18T09:38:44","modified_gmt":"2016-08-18T17:38:44","slug":"dilberts-scott-adams-robert-cialdini-likely-advising-hillary-clinton","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/?p=103870","title":{"rendered":"Dilbert\u2019s Scott Adams: Robert Cialdini Likely Advising Hillary Clinton"},"content":{"rendered":"

Joel Pollak writes<\/a>: <\/p>\n

Cartoonist-turned-pundit Scott Adams, of Dilbert fame, told Breitbart News in an interview on Sunday that the mysterious \u201cGodzilla\u201d of persuasion, to whom he ascribes Hillary Clinton\u2019s polling success, is behavioral psychologist Robert Cialdini.
\nCialdini, who refers to himself as the \u201cGodfather of Influence,\u201d is a professor and bestselling author who specializes in the art \u2014 or, perhaps, the science \u2014 of persuasion. In 2012, he was part of a \u201cdream team\u201d of behavioral psychologists that advised President Barack Obama\u2019s re-election campaign, and helped propel that effort to victory despite slow economic growth, high unemployment, turmoil in world affairs, new terror attacks, and a motivated (though IRS-crippled) Tea Party opposition.<\/p>\n

The New York Times reported in November 2012, after Obama\u2019s victory \u2014 which stunned his rivals, who expected to win:<\/p>\n

“This election season the Obama campaign won a reputation for drawing on the tools of social science \u2026<\/p>\n

Less well known is that the Obama campaign also had a panel of unpaid academic advisers. The group \u2014 which calls itself the \u201cconsortium of behavioral scientists,\u201d or COBS \u2014 provided ideas on how to counter false rumors, like one that President Obama is a Muslim. It suggested how to characterize the Republican opponent, Mitt Romney, in advertisements. It also delivered research-based advice on how to mobilize voters.<\/p>\n

\u2026<\/p>\n

In addition to Dr. [Craig] Fox, the consortium included Susan T. Fiske of Princeton University; Samuel L. Popkin of the University of California, San Diego; Robert Cialdini, a professor emeritus at Arizona State University; Richard H. Thaler, a professor of behavioral science and economics at the University of Chicago\u2019s business school; and Michael Morris, a psychologist at Columbia.”<\/p>\n

In recent blog posts on the election \u2014 followed increasingly closely by news junkies, and Trump supporters seeking consolation \u2014 Adams has referred to a \u201cGodzilla\u201d of persuasion who may have started working for the Clinton campaign.<\/p>\n

That Godzilla, Adams says, is Cialdini.<\/p>\n

Adams told Breitbart News that he believes that Cialdini may have sat out the Democratic Party primary \u2014 or perhaps worked for Sen. Bernie Sanders \u2014 then joined the Clinton effort once it became clear she would be the party\u2019s nominee.<\/p>\n

While Trump had been more effective at using persuasion techniques, he said, \u201cthe Clinton persuasion game went from non-existent, which I reported on for months, to solid-gold, weapons-grade, almost instantly, as soon as Bernie Sanders dropped out.\u201d<\/p>\n

Sanders had been outperforming expectations, and Clinton had been underperforming expectations. \u201cWherever you see somebody exceed expectations by that much, either they are a persuader, like Trump is, or they have somebody helping them,\u201d Adams concluded.<\/p>\n

That stopped, as soon as Sanders yielded to Clinton.<\/p>\n

Adams explained: \u201cClinton stopped talking about her boring policies, and details, and her experience, and she went to pure persuasion. She went to the bigger scare,\u201d which was the image of Donald Trump with his finger on the nuclear button.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

From the Chateau<\/a>:<\/p>\n

FYI, this confirms my suspicion that Scott Adams is a reader of Game websites, and has probably stopped by the Chateau for a visit or ten. Robert Cialdini is an intellectual father of early Game principles that have withstood the test of time, (a substantial body of Mystery\u2019s and Tyler Durden\u2019s work and in-field experimentation exploited Cialdini\u2019s knowledge from his book Influence: The Psychology of Persuasion).<\/p>\n

I won\u2019t put too fine a point on it: If Cialdini is now working for TheCunt, like he did for the Gay Mulatto, then The Trumpening is imperiled. Game is an awesomely powerful seduction tool, whether used to bed women or bed voters, and Cialdini would be a presumed master of the craft. I\u2019ve no doubt that his input could very well have been responsible for recently shifting the polls so dramatically in TheCunt\u2019s favor in such a short time. Game isn\u2019t called accelerated seduction for nothing.<\/p>\n

Trump is himself no slouch in the Game department, but he has a tendency to get mired in the thickets of interpersonal affront, and can be sloppy about message discipline. Trump needs to nail down his state control. These are the classic flaws of The Natural, btw, so I\u2019m not surprised by their evidence in Trump whose biography provides ample evidence that he is a natural shitlord, aka the social hub alpha male who did well with the ladies from the get-go.<\/p>\n

Trump\u2019s strong character suits are an earthy humor and an honest, straight-shooting conversationalist style. These are big pluses that nonetheless can be easily twisted by the media hate machine into meanings completely at odds with what Trump intended to convey. We see that happening more now, as expert persuasion artists like Cialdini are beginning to inform the globalists how to effectively counter Trump\u2019s strengths.<\/p>\n

Trump has to know that the foes he is battling now are not trifling betas like \u00a1Jeb! or Rubio or spergy try-hards like Cruz or shell-shocked cuckservatives who just can\u2019t even. He is up against the most lethal psy ops campaign I believe we will witness in our lifetimes. (Because if it gets any more lethal than it already is, the rhetoric will yield to hot lead).<\/p>\n

Cialdini and the persuasion techniques that he and others have written extensively on may very well have been a lynchpin in the Gay Mulatto\u2019s election wins. Game is all too powerful. It frightens manlet newbs, cucks, tradcons, and feminists for good reason: it\u2019s a refutation of mortal MUH GENTEEL CONSTITUTIONAL PRINCIPLES and MUH SEX EQUALISM, replaced by the immortal God of Biomechanics.<\/p>\n

If Cialdini has now brought the accumulated knowledge of the Game community to Hillary\u2019s campaign operations, it bodes ominous for a smooth Trump Train ride to victory. Although it would serve as a jarring confirmation of Game principles and stroke my already tumescent ego to greater heights, it saddens me to think Game forefathers may have vaulted Obama (& perhaps TheCunt?) to the Presidency. Sadden, because those Game principles are rightly the property of the alt-right and the sundry shitlords who are currently engaged in a winning meme war against a century-old enemy drunk on entrenched power.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Joel Pollak writes: Cartoonist-turned-pundit Scott Adams, of Dilbert fame, told Breitbart News in an interview on Sunday that the mysterious \u201cGodzilla\u201d of persuasion, to whom he ascribes Hillary Clinton\u2019s polling success, is behavioral psychologist Robert Cialdini. Cialdini, who refers to … Continue reading →<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"om_disable_all_campaigns":false,"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[42720,21791,29747],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-103870","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-alt-right","category-america","category-game"],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/103870","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=103870"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/103870\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":103872,"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/103870\/revisions\/103872"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=103870"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=103870"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=103870"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}