{"id":102057,"date":"2016-07-24T07:34:14","date_gmt":"2016-07-24T15:34:14","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/?p=102057"},"modified":"2016-07-24T08:24:02","modified_gmt":"2016-07-24T16:24:02","slug":"which-american-intellectuals-pushed-for-for-overthrow-of-assad-in-syria","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/?p=102057","title":{"rendered":"Which American Intellectuals Pushed For Overthrow Of Assad In Syria?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>As the Twitter user #thelatempire <A HREF=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/thelateempire\/status\/756969362070921216\">notes<\/a>: &#8220;Syria war has been the most globally destabilizing event since 9\/11.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>So who pushed for this disaster? People like the neoconservative Charles Krauthammer.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p><A HREF=\"https:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/opinions\/charles-krauthammer-shamed-into-war\/2013\/08\/29\/b97a67a8-10cb-11e3-b4cb-fd7ce041d814_story.html\">8\/29\/13 Washington Post<\/a>:<\/p>\n<p>Having leaked to the world, and thus to Syrian President Bashar al-Assad, a detailed briefing of the coming U.S. air attack on Syria \u2014 (1) the source (offshore warships and perhaps a bomber or two), (2) the weapon (cruise missiles), (3) the duration (two or three days), (4) the purpose (punishment, not \u201cregime change\u201d) \u2014 perhaps we should be publishing the exact time the bombs will fall, lest we disrupt dinner in Damascus.<\/p>\n<p>So much for the element of surprise. Into his third year of dithering, two years after declaring Assad had to go, one year after drawing \u2014 then erasing \u2014 his own red line on chemical weapons, Barack Obama has been stirred to action.<\/p>\n<p>Or more accurately, shamed into action. Which is the worst possible reason. A president doesn\u2019t commit soldiers to a war for which he has zero enthusiasm. Nor does one go to war for demonstration purposes.<\/p>\n<p>Want to send a message? Call Western Union. A Tomahawk missile is for killing. A serious instrument of war demands a serious purpose.<\/p>\n<p>The purpose can be either punitive or strategic: either a spasm of conscience that will inflame our opponents yet leave not a trace, or a considered application of abundant American power to alter the strategic equation that is now heavily favoring our worst enemies in the heart of the Middle East&#8230;<\/p>\n<p>Of Assad\u2019s 20 air bases, notes retired Gen. Jack Keane, six are primary. Attack them: the runways, the fighters, the helicopters, the fuel depots, the nearby command structures. Render them inoperable.<\/p>\n<p>We don\u2019t need to take down Syria\u2019s air defense system, as we did in Libya. To disable air power, we can use standoff systems \u2014 cruise missiles fired from ships offshore and from aircraft loaded with long-range, smart munitions that need not overfly Syrian territory.<\/p>\n<p>Depriving Assad of his total control of the air and making resupply from Iran and Russia far more difficult would alter the course of the war. That is a serious purpose.<\/p>\n<p>Would the American people support it? They are justifiably war-weary and want no part of this conflict. <\/p><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>As the Twitter user #thelatempire notes: &#8220;Syria war has been the most globally destabilizing event since 9\/11.&#8221; So who pushed for this disaster? People like the neoconservative Charles Krauthammer. 8\/29\/13 Washington Post: Having leaked to the world, and thus to &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/?p=102057\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[21791,29639],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-102057","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-america","category-syria"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/102057","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=102057"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/102057\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":102084,"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/102057\/revisions\/102084"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=102057"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=102057"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lukeford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=102057"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}